-- En reponse de "Re: 2.4.20 scsi problem" de Alan Cox, le 02-Dec-2002 : > On Mon, 2002-12-02 at 06:58, Eric GAUDET wrote: >> # SCSI low-level drivers >> # >> (none set) > > That sounds like your problem to me Unfortuately, as I said in my earlier message: >> Compiling sd as a module instead of in the kernel does not seem to change >> anything. Nor compiling with a scsi low-level driver. It seems that I need an >> actual scsi device at boot time in order to see block device 8 (not tested, I >> donīt have such a device) Just for kicks, I tried with: CONFIG_SCSI_AHA152X=y but it does not seem to help. The .config I used for 2.4.18 (the one that is working fine), and the one for 2.4.20 are exactly the same, I just loaded it with make oldconfig without changing a thing. I can send those two config files if it helps. Anyway, just asking for scsi disk support should be enough to see block device 8 (and it used to work just fine) without needing a low-level driver at boot time: I boot on my ide driver and plug my external scsi HD (really a usb HD using scsi subsystem) afterwards. dmesg used to report: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00 request_module[scsi_hostadapter]: Root fs not mounted Now it says: SCSI subsystem driver Revision: 1.00 kmod: failed to exec /sbin/modprobe -s -k scsi_hostadapter, errno = 2 Do this mean nobody else is seeing the problem? Thanks, ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Eric GAUDET Le 02-Dec-2002 a 19:38:34 ------------------------------------------------------------------------ - To unsubscribe from this list: send the line "unsubscribe linux-scsi" in the body of a message to majordomo@vger.kernel.org More majordomo info at http://vger.kernel.org/majordomo-info.html