From: Niklas Cassel <Niklas.Cassel@wdc.com>
To: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>,
John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
"tj@kernel.org" <tj@kernel.org>,
"linux-ide@vger.kernel.org" <linux-ide@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] ata: libata-core: do not issue non-internal commands once EH is pending
Date: Wed, 9 Nov 2022 09:28:12 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <Y2tyqn+VAVfL+muq@x1-carbon> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <c0a34e41-17ca-cbc1-cf54-9fee23b830a3@suse.de>
On Wed, Nov 09, 2022 at 08:11:17AM +0100, Hannes Reinecke wrote:
> Thanks for the detailed explanation, Niklas.
>
> However, one fundamental thing is still unresolved:
> I've switched SCSI EH to do asynchronous aborts with commit e494f6a72839
> ("[SCSI] improved eh timeout handler"); since then commands will be aborted
> without invoking SCSI EH.
>
> This goes _fundamentally_ against libata's .eh_strategy (as it's never
> invoked), and as such libata _cannot_ use command aborts.
> Which typically wouldn't matter as ATA doesn't have command aborts, and
> realistically any error is causing the NCQ queue to be drained.
>
> So SCSI EH scsi_abort_command() really shouldn't queue a workqueue item, as
> it'll never be able to do anything meaningful.
>
> You need this patch:
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index be2a70c5ac6d..4fb72b73871e 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -242,6 +242,11 @@ scsi_abort_command(struct scsi_cmnd *scmd)
> return FAILED;
> }
>
> + if (!hostt->eh_abort_handler) {
> + /* No abort handler, fail command directly */
> + return FAILED;
> + }
> +
> spin_lock_irqsave(shost->host_lock, flags);
> if (shost->eh_deadline != -1 && !shost->last_reset)
> shost->last_reset = jiffies;
>
> to avoid having libata trying to queue a (pointless) abort workqueue item,
> and get rid of the various workqueue thingies you mentioned above.
>
> And it's a sensible fix anyway, will be sending it as a separate patch.
Hello Hannes,
This is how it looks before your patch:
scsi_logging_level -s -E 7
[ 33.737069] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 abort scheduled
[ 33.738812] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#3 abort scheduled
[ 33.749085] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 aborting command
[ 33.751393] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 cmd abort failed
[ 33.753541] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#3 aborting command
[ 33.755565] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#3 cmd abort failed
[ 33.763051] scsi host0: Waking error handler thread
[ 33.765727] scsi host0: scsi_eh_0: waking up 0/2/2
[ 33.768815] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x9 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 33.772211] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000000
[ 33.774187] ata1.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
[ 33.776962] ata1.00: cmd 61/00:00:00:00:0f/01:00:00:00:00/40 tag 0 ncq dma 131072 out
[ 33.776962] res 43/04:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x400 (NCQ error) <F>
[ 33.783598] ata1.00: status: { DRDY SENSE ERR }
[ 33.785252] ata1.00: error: { ABRT }
[ 33.791290] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
[ 33.792195] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#0 scsi_eh_0: flush finish cmd
[ 33.793426] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#3 scsi_eh_0: flush finish cmd
[ 33.794653] ata1: EH complete
So we do get the scmd:s sent to ATA EH (strategy_handler).
In scmd_eh_abort_handler(), scsi_try_to_abort_cmd() will return FAILED
since hostt->eh_abort_handler is not implemented for libata, so
scmd_eh_abort_handler() will do goto out; which calls scsi_eh_scmd_add().
This is how it looks after your patch:
scsi_logging_level -s -E 7
[ 223.417749] scsi host0: Waking error handler thread
[ 223.419782] scsi host0: scsi_eh_0: waking up 0/2/2
[ 223.423101] ata1.00: exception Emask 0x0 SAct 0x80002 SErr 0x0 action 0x0
[ 223.425362] ata1.00: irq_stat 0x40000008
[ 223.426778] ata1.00: failed command: WRITE FPDMA QUEUED
[ 223.428925] ata1.00: cmd 61/00:08:00:00:0f/01:00:00:00:00/40 tag 1 ncq dma 131072 out
[ 223.428925] res 43/04:00:00:00:00/00:00:00:00:00/00 Emask 0x400 (NCQ error) <F>
[ 223.436077] ata1.00: status: { DRDY SENSE ERR }
[ 223.438015] ata1.00: error: { ABRT }
[ 223.441179] ata1.00: Security Log not supported
[ 223.445698] ata1.00: Security Log not supported
[ 223.448475] ata1.00: configured for UDMA/100
[ 223.449790] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#1 scsi_eh_0: flush finish cmd
[ 223.451063] sd 0:0:0:0: [sda] tag#19 scsi_eh_0: flush finish cmd
[ 223.452648] ata1: EH complete
So your patch looks good to me, like you said, it removes a
a pointless queue_work().
Do we perhaps want to remove the !hostt->eh_abort_handler check
from scmd_eh_abort_handler(), now when you've moved it earlier
(to scsi_abort_command()) ? Perhaps we need to keep it, since
the function used for checking this, scsi_try_to_abort_cmd()
is used in other places as well.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-11-09 9:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 5+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <20221107161036.670237-1-niklas.cassel@wdc.com>
[not found] ` <5a4fa5db-c706-5cf2-1145-bf091445d20e@oracle.com>
[not found] ` <Y2mbX8MvYrF0FHaI@x1-carbon>
2022-11-08 3:50 ` [PATCH v2] ata: libata-core: do not issue non-internal commands once EH is pending Damien Le Moal
2022-11-08 23:14 ` Niklas Cassel
2022-11-09 7:11 ` Hannes Reinecke
2022-11-09 9:28 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2022-11-09 9:37 ` Hannes Reinecke
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=Y2tyqn+VAVfL+muq@x1-carbon \
--to=niklas.cassel@wdc.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox