public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>
Cc: Douglas Gilbert <dgilbert@interlog.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, martin.petersen@oracle.com,
	jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, kashyap.desai@broadcom.com,
	axboe@kernel.dk
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi_debug: fix cmd_per_lun, set to max_queue
Date: Fri, 16 Apr 2021 16:50:40 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YHlP4J2MKSCM+phB@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <71e8b42a-f368-2477-ac83-60a750f157f6@huawei.com>

On Fri, Apr 16, 2021 at 09:33:48AM +0100, John Garry wrote:
> On 16/04/2021 09:26, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > 'cmd_per_lun' should have been set as correct from the beginning instead
> > > > of capping it for changing queue depth:
> > > > 
> > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > > > index 697c09ef259b..0d9954eabbb8 100644
> > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/hosts.c
> > > > @@ -414,7 +414,7 @@ struct Scsi_Host *scsi_host_alloc(struct scsi_host_template *sht, int privsize)
> > > >    	shost->can_queue = sht->can_queue;
> > > >    	shost->sg_tablesize = sht->sg_tablesize;
> > > >    	shost->sg_prot_tablesize = sht->sg_prot_tablesize;
> > > > -	shost->cmd_per_lun = sht->cmd_per_lun;
> > > > +	shost->cmd_per_lun = min_t(int, sht->cmd_per_lun, shost->can_queue);
> > > >    	shost->no_write_same = sht->no_write_same;
> > > >    	shost->host_tagset = sht->host_tagset;
> > > My concern here is that it is a common pattern in LLDDs to overwrite the
> > > initial shost member values between scsi_host_alloc() and scsi_add_host().
> > OK, then can we move the fix into beginning of scsi_add_host()?
> 
> I suppose that would be ok, but we don't do much sanitizing shost values at
> that point. Apart from failing can_queue == 0.

.can_queue has been finalized in scsi_add_host(), since it will be used for
setting tagset, so .can_queue is reliable at that time.

>I suppose failing can_queue < cmd_per_lun could also be added.

That will fail add host for scsi_debug simply.


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2021-04-16  8:51 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-04-15  1:50 [PATCH] scsi_debug: fix cmd_per_lun, set to max_queue Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-15  9:15 ` John Garry
2021-04-16  1:46   ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16  8:17     ` John Garry
2021-04-16  8:26       ` Ming Lei
2021-04-16  8:33         ` John Garry
2021-04-16  8:50           ` Ming Lei [this message]
2021-04-16  9:07             ` John Garry
2021-04-16  9:12 ` John Garry
2021-04-16 16:32   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-04-29 13:17     ` John Garry

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YHlP4J2MKSCM+phB@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=dgilbert@interlog.com \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox