public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
To: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>,
	Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: core: put LLD module refcnt after SCSI device is released
Date: Thu, 30 Sep 2021 12:12:36 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YVWNlJh/XhRNawdI@kroah.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YVV411YJfMcnk38b@T590>

On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 04:44:07PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:29:24AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 04:20:11PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 10:07:44AM +0200, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > On Thu, Sep 30, 2021 at 03:40:26PM +0800, Ming Lei wrote:
> > > > > SCSI host release is triggered when SCSI device is freed, and we have to
> > > > > make sure that LLD module won't be unloaded before SCSI host instance is
> > > > > released because shost->hostt is required in host release handler.
> > > > > 
> > > > > So put LLD module refcnt after SCSI device is released.
> > > > > 
> > > > > The real release handler can be run from wq context in case of
> > > > > in_interrupt(), so add one atomic counter for serializing putting
> > > > > module via current and wq context. This way is fine since we don't
> > > > > call scsi_device_put() in fast IO path.
> > > > > 
> > > > > Reported-by: Changhui Zhong <czhong@redhat.com>
> > > > > Reported-by: Yi Zhang <yi.zhang@redhat.com>
> > > > > Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@linuxfoundation.org>
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> > > > > ---
> > > > >  drivers/scsi/scsi.c        |  8 +++++++-
> > > > >  drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c  | 10 ++++++++++
> > > > >  include/scsi/scsi_device.h |  2 ++
> > > > >  3 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> > > > > 
> > > > > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > > > index b241f9e3885c..b6612161587f 100644
> > > > > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > > > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi.c
> > > > > @@ -553,8 +553,14 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(scsi_device_get);
> > > > >   */
> > > > >  void scsi_device_put(struct scsi_device *sdev)
> > > > >  {
> > > > > -	module_put(sdev->host->hostt->module);
> > > > > +	struct module *mod = sdev->host->hostt->module;
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	atomic_inc(&sdev->put_dev_cnt);
> > > > 
> > > > Ick, no!  Why are you making a new lock and reference count for no
> > > > reason?
> > > 
> > > The reason is to make sure that the LLD module is only put from either
> > > scsi_device_put() and scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext().
> > > 
> > > > 
> > > > > +
> > > > >  	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> > > > > +
> > > > > +	if (atomic_dec_if_positive(&sdev->put_dev_cnt) >= 0)
> > > > > +		module_put(mod);
> > > > 
> > > > How do you know if your module pointer is still valid here?
> > > 
> > > module refcnt is grabbed in scsi_device_get(), so it is valid.
> > 
> > Then you don't need the extra atomic variable.
> > 
> > > > 
> > > > Why do you care?
> > > > 
> > > > What problem are you trying to solve and why is it unique to scsi
> > > > devices?
> > > 
> > > See it from the commit log:
> > > 
> > > 	SCSI host release is triggered when SCSI device is freed, and we have to
> > > 	make sure that LLD module won't be unloaded before SCSI host instance is
> > > 	released because shost->hostt is required in host release handler.
> > 
> > What is "hostt"?
> 
> hostt is 'struct scsi_host_template' which is defined in LLD module, and
> often allocated as static global variable, that is what try_get_module()
> tries to protect.
> 
> > 
> > > 	
> > > 	So put LLD module refcnt after SCSI device is released.
> > 
> > Why not just drop it explicitly when you drop the reference count of the
> > device object?  Like you tried to do here, but no need for the extra
> > atomic variable.
> 
> scsi_device_dev_release_usercontext() may be scheduled via schedule_work from
> the device object's release handler for releasing the scsi_device, which may
> trigger scsi host's release handler in which hostt is required.

If a release handler can be called from the device release function,
then that is when you need to drop the reference, after that function is
finished being called, right?

thanks,

greg k-h

  reply	other threads:[~2021-09-30 10:12 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-09-30  7:40 [PATCH V2] scsi: core: put LLD module refcnt after SCSI device is released Ming Lei
2021-09-30  7:50 ` Ming Lei
2021-09-30  8:07 ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-09-30  8:20   ` Ming Lei
2021-09-30  8:29     ` Greg Kroah-Hartman
2021-09-30  8:44       ` Ming Lei
2021-09-30 10:12         ` Greg Kroah-Hartman [this message]
2021-09-30 11:07           ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YVWNlJh/XhRNawdI@kroah.com \
    --to=gregkh@linuxfoundation.org \
    --cc=czhong@redhat.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=yi.zhang@redhat.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox