public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
To: Mike Christie <michael.christie@oracle.com>
Cc: bvanassche@acm.org, lduncan@suse.com, cleech@redhat.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] scsi: Allow drivers to set BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING
Date: Wed, 9 Mar 2022 09:43:24 +0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <YigGPK3zLAN87mSS@T590> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b1b7fa2c-ade3-987d-e240-fb6acb421b99@oracle.com>

On Tue, Mar 08, 2022 at 07:17:13PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> On 3/8/22 6:53 PM, Ming Lei wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 07, 2022 at 06:39:54PM -0600, Mike Christie wrote:
> >> The software iscsi driver's queuecommand can block and taking the extra
> >> hop from kblockd to its workqueue results in a performance hit. Allowing
> >> it to set BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING and transmit from that context directly
> >> results in a 20-30% improvement in IOPs for workloads like:
> >>
> >> fio --filename=/dev/sdb --direct=1 --rw=randrw --bs=4k --ioengine=libaio
> >> --iodepth=128  --numjobs=1
> >>
> >> and for all write workloads.
> > 
> > This single patch shouldn't make any difference for iscsi, so please
> > make it as last one if performance improvement data is provided
> > in commit log.
> 
> Ok.
> 
> > 
> > Also is there performance effect for other worloads? such as multiple
> > jobs? iscsi is SQ hardware, so if driver is blocked in ->queuecommand()
> > via BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING, other contexts can't submit IO to scsi ML any more.
> 
> If you mean multiple jobs running on the same connection/session then
> they are all serialized now. A connection can only do 1 cmd at a time.
> There's a big mutex around it in the network layer, so multiple jobs
> just suck no matter what.

I guess one block device can only bind to one isci connection, given the
1 cmd per connection limit, so looks multiple jobs is fine.

> 
> If you mean multiple jobs from different connection/sessions, then the
> iscsi code with this patchset blocks only because the network layer
> takes a mutex for a short time. We configure it to not block for things
> like socket space, memory allocations, we do zero copy IO normally, etc
> so it's quick.
> 
> We also can do up to workqueues max_active limit worth of calls so
> other things can normally send IO. We haven't found a need to increase
> it yet.
 
I meant that hctx->run_work is required for blk-mq to dispatch IO, iscsi is
SQ HBA, so there is only single work_struct. If one context is blocked in
->queue_rq or ->queuecommand, other contexts can't submit IO to driver any
more.


Thanks,
Ming


  reply	other threads:[~2022-03-09  1:43 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-03-08  0:39 [RFC PATCH 0/4] scsi/iscsi: Send iscsi data from kblockd Mike Christie
2022-03-08  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 1/4] scsi: Allow drivers to set BLK_MQ_F_BLOCKING Mike Christie
2022-03-08  4:57   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-03-08  7:00   ` Daejun Park
2022-03-08 16:14     ` Mike Christie
2022-03-09  0:53   ` Ming Lei
2022-03-09  1:17     ` Mike Christie
2022-03-09  1:43       ` Ming Lei [this message]
2022-03-09 19:38         ` Mike Christie
2022-03-08  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 2/4] scsi: iscsi: Tell drivers when we must not block Mike Christie
2022-03-08  4:59   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-03-08 15:58     ` Mike Christie
2022-03-08  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 3/4] scsi: iscsi: Support transmit from queuecommand Mike Christie
2022-03-08  0:39 ` [RFC PATCH 4/4] scsi: iscsi_tcp: Allow user to control if " Mike Christie
2022-03-08  5:10   ` Bart Van Assche
2022-03-08 16:51     ` Mike Christie
2022-03-15  8:26 ` [RFC PATCH 0/4] scsi/iscsi: Send iscsi data from kblockd Christoph Hellwig
2022-03-16  1:08   ` Ming Lei

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=YigGPK3zLAN87mSS@T590 \
    --to=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cleech@redhat.com \
    --cc=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=lduncan@suse.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=michael.christie@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox