Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <jejb@linux.ibm.com>,
	"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
	Xiang Chen <chenxiang66@hisilicon.com>,
	Artur Paszkiewicz <artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com>,
	Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	TJ Adams <tadamsjr@google.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices
Date: Tue, 5 Mar 2024 16:23:49 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <Zee3lQWln9tfrlC-@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <b7ca1a8f-c723-494c-b9f8-af9e75ac0afe@kernel.org>

On Wed, Mar 06, 2024 at 09:01:41AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 3/6/24 08:58, Igor Pylypiv wrote:
> > Libata sysfs attributes cannot be used for libsas managed SATA devices
> > because the ata_port location is different for libsas.
> > 
> > Defined sysfs attributes (visible for SATA devices only):
> > - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_enable
> > - /sys/block/sda/device/ncq_prio_supported
> > 
> > The newly defined attributes will pass the correct ata_port to libata
> > helper functions.
> > 
> > Reviewed-by: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>
> > Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
> > Reviewed-by: Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c | 94 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  include/scsi/sas_ata.h        |  6 +++
> >  2 files changed, 100 insertions(+)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > index 12e2653846e3..04b0bd9a4e01 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_ata.c
> > @@ -964,3 +964,97 @@ int sas_execute_ata_cmd(struct domain_device *device, u8 *fis, int force_phy_id)
> >  			       force_phy_id, &tmf_task);
> >  }
> >  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_execute_ata_cmd);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_supported_show(struct device *device,
> > +					   struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +					   char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > +	struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > +	bool supported;
> > +	int rc;
> > +
> > +	/* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	rc = ata_ncq_prio_supported(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &supported);
> > +	if (rc)
> > +		return rc;
> > +
> > +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", supported);
> > +}
> > +
> > +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_supported, S_IRUGO, sas_ncq_prio_supported_show, NULL);
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_show(struct device *device,
> > +					struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +					char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > +	struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > +	bool enabled;
> > +	int rc;
> > +
> > +	/* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	rc = ata_ncq_prio_enabled(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, &enabled);
> > +	if (rc)
> > +		return rc;
> > +
> > +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", enabled);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static ssize_t sas_ncq_prio_enable_store(struct device *device,
> > +					 struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +					 const char *buf, size_t len)
> > +{
> > +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(device);
> > +	struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > +	bool enable;
> > +	int rc;
> > +
> > +	/* This attribute shall be visible for SATA devices only */
> > +	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(!dev_is_sata(ddev)))
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +	rc = kstrtobool(buf, &enable);
> > +	if (rc)
> > +		return rc;
> > +
> > +	rc = ata_ncq_prio_enable(ddev->sata_dev.ap, sdev, enable);
> > +	if (rc)
> > +		return rc;
> > +
> > +	return len;
> > +}
> > +
> > +DEVICE_ATTR(ncq_prio_enable, S_IRUGO | S_IWUSR,
> > +	    sas_ncq_prio_enable_show, sas_ncq_prio_enable_store);
> > +
> > +static struct attribute *sas_ata_sdev_attrs[] = {
> > +	&dev_attr_ncq_prio_supported.attr,
> > +	&dev_attr_ncq_prio_enable.attr,
> > +	NULL
> > +};
> > +
> > +static umode_t sas_ata_attr_is_visible(struct kobject *kobj,
> > +				       struct attribute *attr, int i)
> > +{
> > +	struct device *dev = kobj_to_dev(kobj);
> > +	struct scsi_device *sdev = to_scsi_device(dev);
> > +	struct domain_device *ddev = sdev_to_domain_dev(sdev);
> > +
> > +	if (!dev_is_sata(ddev))
> > +		return 0;
> > +
> > +	return attr->mode;
> > +}
> > +
> > +const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group = {
> > +	.attrs = sas_ata_sdev_attrs,
> > +	.is_visible = sas_ata_attr_is_visible,
> > +};
> > +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(sas_ata_sdev_attr_group);
> > diff --git a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > index 2f8c719840a6..59a75cd8b5e0 100644
> > --- a/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > +++ b/include/scsi/sas_ata.h
> > @@ -39,6 +39,8 @@ int smp_ata_check_ready_type(struct ata_link *link);
> >  int sas_discover_sata(struct domain_device *dev);
> >  int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *phy,
> >  		    struct domain_device *child, int phy_id);
> > +
> > +extern const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group;
> >  #else
> >  
> >  static inline void sas_ata_disabled_notice(void)
> > @@ -123,6 +125,10 @@ static inline int sas_ata_add_dev(struct domain_device *parent, struct ex_phy *p
> >  	sas_ata_disabled_notice();
> >  	return -ENODEV;
> >  }
> > +
> > +static const struct attribute_group sas_ata_sdev_attr_group __maybe_unused = {
> > +	.attrs = NULL,
> > +};
> 
> Looks OK, but I must say that I would prefer John's idea with the #define as
> that removes the variable definition entirely.

I'm fine with chaning the code to use #define.

My only concern is that C++ compilers complain about taking address of rvalue.
Looks like this is not an issue for C compilers.

I'll send v7 with the #define approach shortly.

> 
> >  #endif
> >  
> >  #endif /* _SAS_ATA_H_ */
> 
> -- 
> Damien Le Moal
> Western Digital Research
> 

  reply	other threads:[~2024-03-06  0:23 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2024-03-05 23:58 [PATCH v6 0/7] NCQ Priority sysfs sttributes for libsas Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 1/7] ata: libata-sata: Factor out NCQ Priority configuration helpers Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:11   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 2/7] scsi: libsas: Define NCQ Priority sysfs attributes for SATA devices Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  0:01   ` Damien Le Moal
2024-03-06  0:23     ` Igor Pylypiv [this message]
2024-03-06  7:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 3/7] scsi: pm80xx: Add libsas SATA sysfs attributes group Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 4/7] scsi: mvsas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 5/7] scsi: hisi_sas: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 6/7] scsi: aic94xx: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2024-03-05 23:58 ` [PATCH v6 7/7] scsi: isci: " Igor Pylypiv
2024-03-06  7:17   ` Hannes Reinecke

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=Zee3lQWln9tfrlC-@google.com \
    --to=ipylypiv@google.com \
    --cc=artur.paszkiewicz@intel.com \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=chenxiang66@hisilicon.com \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=tadamsjr@google.com \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox