From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 708501DF749; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:38:56 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752485936; cv=none; b=l0dNhGY0+HwzwIEPjQp8KynAOLQCnyIEyk2HR+qaVybMBtiBmLNYErGkuAOlhnxGrbcKKg0LPbjTw+F373wGAZo+Z0hmzEtitf1myGNWovygyCL2PBPdP2PWI+A8kfcCiINBIViejo6MM5saSedWxtldxoB87ndzJP/ZzUDjIgU= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1752485936; c=relaxed/simple; bh=fMtL5H8zJJ9zr8cIoa0AGjrx47LxHKN3MojnDBeUlyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:Message-ID:References:MIME-Version: Content-Type:Content-Disposition:In-Reply-To; b=AtJygyVXWuXDNe468UX1A0IknTv+ufBcg/UaOGLwAcKLG1gUyALO4Lp9S9KJuDX0HgKdFvbnJSH9Bm86U0Lt3GNvHJmoKhVhVL14Q2zHqenES0Y1anNdkjAhEsKBCayyJVO7OA+QDD8VNk0ZZy8nvAse219UonGJgoPVI33pBG0= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=WzsXWZoK; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="WzsXWZoK" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 503B9C4CEED; Mon, 14 Jul 2025 09:38:54 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1752485935; bh=fMtL5H8zJJ9zr8cIoa0AGjrx47LxHKN3MojnDBeUlyw=; h=Date:From:To:Cc:Subject:References:In-Reply-To:From; b=WzsXWZoKuJmmI9v3HWKv+1ihiM2ZbaTeySkbKh0pSjmgtsS/OPblbFwDZ0Lbk+yl6 Ssdlycn4V0go8FNqDv4+kPG8fIchRiSVaZbvxJpv8QY+3KKShQFrL4300kvn3emH3r zGgDdAxwVRecbYfFAJez13Zkc25+qansZ4QYQANJoWhq0Gm1g/4q83CQSEIYJqO9Tt xCWOo7fcxLboFRiGMRql5MLaZNDd4OBTAwYQxlydBZ5kXi+DE+XXTg5k8m7F6OcUDe 7yu8QdC14cQoytc3WMQEinULuvDHsihtGOorfOBB7AuAc6CnMFWogRvDK/zRHlM2Tf GhSPclYA685EA== Date: Mon, 14 Jul 2025 11:38:51 +0200 From: Niklas Cassel To: "Martin K . Petersen" Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , John Garry , Jason Yan , Damien Le Moal Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/3] ata: libata-eh: Simplify reset operation management Message-ID: References: <20250714005454.35802-1-dlemoal@kernel.org> <20250714005454.35802-3-dlemoal@kernel.org> Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20250714005454.35802-3-dlemoal@kernel.org> On Mon, Jul 14, 2025 at 09:54:53AM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote: > Introduce struct ata_reset_operations to aggregate in a single structure > the definitions of the 4 reset methods (prereset, softreset, hardreset > and postreset) for a port. This new structure is used in struct ata_port > to define the reset methods for a regular port (reset field) and for a > port-multiplier port (pmp_reset field). A pointer to either of these > fields replaces the 4 reset method arguments passed to ata_eh_recover() > and ata_eh_reset(). > > The definition of the reset methods for all drivers is changed to use > the reset and pmp_reset fields in struct ata_port_operations. > > A large number of files is modifed, but no functional changes are > introduced. Martin, is it okay if we take this patch via the libata tree? If so, would it be possible to get an Acked-by? Kind regards, Niklas