Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
To: Martin Wilck <mwilck@suse.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Mikulas Patocka <mpatocka@redhat.com>,
	Mike Snitzer <snitzer@kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, dm-devel@lists.linux.dev
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: scsi_dh: Return error pointer in scsi_dh_attached_handler_name
Date: Mon, 1 Dec 2025 20:00:02 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <aS46EpB6dijzABwA@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <94bce7593f2980cef43860044e5b662c3d3c0ec7.camel@suse.com>

On Thu, Nov 27, 2025 at 04:26:51PM +0100, Martin Wilck wrote:
> On Fri, 2025-11-21 at 18:48 -0500, Benjamin Marzinski wrote:
> > If scsi_dh_attached_handler_name() fails to allocate the handler
> > name,
> > dm-multipath (its only caller) assumes there is no attached device
> > handler, and sets the device up incorrectly. Return an error pointer
> > instead, so multipath can distinguish between failure and success
> > where
> > there is no attached device handler.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Benjamin Marzinski <bmarzins@redhat.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/md/dm-mpath.c  | 8 ++++++++
> >  drivers/scsi/scsi_dh.c | 8 +++++---
> >  2 files changed, 13 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > index c18358271618..063dc526fe04 100644
> > --- a/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > +++ b/drivers/md/dm-mpath.c
> > @@ -950,6 +950,14 @@ static struct pgpath *parse_path(struct
> > dm_arg_set *as, struct path_selector *ps
> >  
> >  	q = bdev_get_queue(p->path.dev->bdev);
> >  	attached_handler_name = scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(q,
> > GFP_KERNEL);
> > +	if (IS_ERR(attached_handler_name)) {
> > +		if (PTR_ERR(attached_handler_name) == -ENODEV)
> > +			attached_handler_name = NULL;
> 
> What's the point of continuing here if we know that the SCSI device
> doesn't exist?

we just know that it's not a SCSI device, so we clear
attached_handler_name.  I suppose we could add another check to error
out here if m->hw_handler_name is set. But if it is, the setup_scsi_dh()
call just below will fail anyways, so there's not much difference.

But if you think adding that extra check makes things clearer, I'm fine
with that.

-Ben
 
> Thanks,
> Martin
> 
> > +		else {
> > +			r = PTR_ERR(attached_handler_name);
> > +			goto bad;
> > +		}
> > +	}
> >  	if (attached_handler_name || m->hw_handler_name) {
> >  		INIT_DELAYED_WORK(&p->activate_path,
> > activate_path_work);
> >  		r = setup_scsi_dh(p->path.dev->bdev, m,
> > &attached_handler_name, &ti->error);
> > diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_dh.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_dh.c
> > index 7b56e00c7df6..b9d805317814 100644
> > --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_dh.c
> > +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_dh.c
> > @@ -353,7 +353,8 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(scsi_dh_attach);
> >   *      that may have a device handler attached
> >   * @gfp - the GFP mask used in the kmalloc() call when allocating
> > memory
> >   *
> > - * Returns name of attached handler, NULL if no handler is attached.
> > + * Returns name of attached handler, NULL if no handler is attached,
> > or
> > + * and error pointer if an error occurred.
> >   * Caller must take care to free the returned string.
> >   */
> >  const char *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q,
> > gfp_t gfp)
> > @@ -363,10 +364,11 @@ const char
> > *scsi_dh_attached_handler_name(struct request_queue *q, gfp_t gfp)
> >  
> >  	sdev = scsi_device_from_queue(q);
> >  	if (!sdev)
> > -		return NULL;
> > +		return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
> >  
> >  	if (sdev->handler)
> > -		handler_name = kstrdup(sdev->handler->name, gfp);
> > +		handler_name = kstrdup(sdev->handler->name, gfp) ? :
> > +			       ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
> >  	put_device(&sdev->sdev_gendev);
> >  	return handler_name;
> >  }


  reply	other threads:[~2025-12-02  1:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-11-21 23:48 [PATCH] scsi: scsi_dh: Return error pointer in scsi_dh_attached_handler_name Benjamin Marzinski
2025-11-27 15:26 ` Martin Wilck
2025-12-02  1:00   ` Benjamin Marzinski [this message]
2025-12-02 10:01     ` Martin Wilck

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=aS46EpB6dijzABwA@redhat.com \
    --to=bmarzins@redhat.com \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dm-devel@lists.linux.dev \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=mpatocka@redhat.com \
    --cc=mwilck@suse.com \
    --cc=snitzer@kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox