public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>,
	stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>, Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/9] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code
Date: Mon, 23 Nov 2020 07:46:37 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <adeb251b-bfda-e3c5-e098-4105c2835922@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201123031749.14912-2-bvanassche@acm.org>

On 11/23/20 4:17 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> With the current implementation the following race can happen:
> * blk_pre_runtime_suspend() calls blk_freeze_queue_start() and
>    blk_mq_unfreeze_queue().
> * blk_queue_enter() calls blk_queue_pm_only() and that function returns
>    true.
> * blk_queue_enter() calls blk_pm_request_resume() and that function does
>    not call pm_request_resume() because the queue runtime status is
>    RPM_ACTIVE.
> * blk_pre_runtime_suspend() changes the queue status into RPM_SUSPENDING.
> 
> Fix this race by changing the queue runtime status into RPM_SUSPENDING
> before switching q_usage_counter to atomic mode.
> 
> Acked-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Acked-by: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Cc: stable <stable@vger.kernel.org>
> Fixes: 986d413b7c15 ("blk-mq: Enable support for runtime power management")
> Signed-off-by: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>   block/blk-pm.c | 15 +++++++++------
>   1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
> 
Reviewed-by: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-11-23  6:46 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-23  3:17 [PATCH v3 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SCSI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 1/9] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  6:46   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 2/9] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  6:47   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 3/9] scsi: Pass a request queue pointer to __scsi_execute() Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 4/9] scsi: Inline scsi_mq_alloc_queue() Bart Van Assche
2020-11-24  9:14   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-24  9:49   ` Can Guo
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 5/9] scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door() Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 6/9] scsi_transport_spi: Make spi_execute() accept a request queue pointer Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 7/9] scsi_transport_spi: Freeze request queues instead of quiescing Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  7:02   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-24  5:09     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-11-24  7:13       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 8/9] block, scsi, ide: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche
2020-11-23  3:17 ` [PATCH v3 9/9] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=adeb251b-bfda-e3c5-e098-4105c2835922@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stable@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox