Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
To: Chengfeng Ye <dg573847474@gmail.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Fix potential TOCTOU race in pm8001_find_tag
Date: Mon, 19 Jan 2026 11:39:33 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <ae5cae8b3c4e71cf23b6f48453797ac48bea5914.camel@HansenPartnership.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260117101948.297411-1-dg573847474@gmail.com>

On Sat, 2026-01-17 at 10:19 +0000, Chengfeng Ye wrote:
> A potential time-of-check-time-of-use (TOCTOU) race condition in
> pm8001_find_tag() where task->lldd_task is checked for non-NULL
> and then dereferenced without synchronization to ensure atomicity.
> 
> Since the check of NULL and dereference in pm8001_find_tag() is not
> executed atomically, a race could occur if the callback is executed
> in
> response to an error or timeout on a SAS task issued from the SCSI
> midlayer, while the SAS command is completed and calls
> pm8001_ccb_task_free(), which sets task->lldd_task to NULL, resulting
> in a null pointer being dereferenced in pm8001_find_tag().
> 
> Possible race scenario:
>  CPU0 (Error Handler)           CPU1 (Interrupt Handler)
>   --------------------           ------------------------
>   [SCSI command timeout/error]
>   sas_scsi_recover_host()
>     sas_scsi_find_task()
>       lldd_query_task()
>         pm8001_query_task()
>           pm8001_find_tag()
>             if (task->lldd_task)
>                                    [Hardware interrupt]
>                                      mpi_ssp_completion()
>                                        pm8001_ccb_task_free()
>                                          task->lldd_task = NULL
>             ccb = task->lldd_task
>             *tag = ccb->ccb_tag
>             <- NULL dereference
> 

I don't get how a race is possible here.  Before the query function
begins, the sas logic calls abort task on the tag, which means the
controller should ensure there are no further completion functions for
it regardless of whether the abort succeeds or not.

Regards,

James


  parent reply	other threads:[~2026-01-19 16:39 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-01-17 10:19 [PATCH] scsi: pm8001: Fix potential TOCTOU race in pm8001_find_tag Chengfeng Ye
2026-01-18  9:42 ` Markus Elfring
2026-01-19 15:24 ` Chengfeng Ye
2026-01-19 16:39 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2026-01-19 16:50   ` Chengfeng Ye
2026-01-20  3:42     ` James Bottomley
2026-01-20  4:39       ` Chengfeng Ye
2026-01-20 14:28         ` James Bottomley
2026-01-20 16:39           ` Chengfeng Ye
2026-01-20 23:43           ` Finn Thain

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=ae5cae8b3c4e71cf23b6f48453797ac48bea5914.camel@HansenPartnership.com \
    --to=james.bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
    --cc=dg573847474@gmail.com \
    --cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox