Hi Austin, On Wed, Jun 26, 2002 at 09:18:45AM -0500, Austin Gonyou wrote: > On Wed, 2002-06-26 at 07:33, Kurt Garloff wrote: > > enough guesses have been there not answering your questions ... > > Sure I hear that. But I posted an earlier question about QLA2200 and a You don't think that somebody who reads your message and tries to post a helpful comment scans the list for earlier messages of yours, do you? > PV 660F and not seeing > 8 luns with 2.4.19-pre10. ^^^^^^^ This device needs BLIST_LARGELUN. > I'll take a look at that, and see if I can merge it into -aa4. The patch should be in there, just not the additional devices that need BLIST_LARGELUN. > > The flag does allow a device to use more than 8 LUNs despite it reporting > > as SCSI Version 2 devices (which can not support more than 8 LUNs normally > > ...) > > The flag also needs to be set for some more devices, look for DGC, DELL, CMD > > and CNSi/CNSI devices that already have the BLIST_SPARSELUN flag. > > This would be a DELL device, so I'll see about changing it from > SPARESLUN to LARGELUN? No. Add " | BLIST_LARGELUN" . > > But as you did not post the output of /proc/scsi/scsi nor the syslog > > meesages from your SCSI subsystem nobody knows what devices you're using or > > what actually happens. Just speculations ... > > There's nothing to post from /proc/scsi/scsi or the syslog other than > there's no more than 8 devices on my FC chain. I guess the real point > here is that if you're using FC, you're probably going to use more than > 8 luns, even if not immediately. Especially for large Databases. People could have seen what SCSI device you're using. So I could have told you instead of guessing and risking to add to the noise myself. Regards, -- Kurt Garloff Eindhoven, NL GPG key: See mail header, key servers Linux kernel development SuSE Linux AG, Nuernberg, DE SCSI, Security