From: Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev, linux-ide@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
Date: Fri, 10 Jul 2026 10:06:31 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alCoB5FOGJTljbjU@fedora> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <724b4a01-e396-4cc0-be2a-9860f42d803f@kernel.org>
On Fri, Jul 10, 2026 at 04:25:38PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> > [Severity: High]
> > Does this function need to set ATA_PFLAG_EH_PENDING?
> >
> > Because this flag is not set, ata_port_eh_scheduled() will evaluate to
> > false. This allows the block layer to immediately retry the requeued
> > commands, which __ata_scsi_queuecmd() will accept and re-defer, keeping
> > the host busy.
>
> No it will not because this is called with SCSI EH already waiting to run, so
> newly incoming commands are not passed down by the scsi layer.
Could you please point to specific functions + lines in the code?
AFAICT, I don't see how SCSI EH is waiting to run when
scsi_eh_scmd_add() has not yet been called.
Note that all the places that currently call ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc()
are called when ATA_PFLAG_EH_PENDING | ATA_PFLAG_EH_IN_PROGRESS
(ata_port_eh_scheduled() evaluates to true).
We could add an WARN_ON(!ata_port_eh_scheduled) in ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc()
and we would never see the warning.
With the new function ata_scsi_port_eh_timed_out(), AFAICT, it can call
ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() before ata_port_eh_scheduled() evaluates to true.
See e.g. the commit message for:
e20e81a24a4d ("ata: libata-core: do not issue non-internal commands once EH is pending")
of why I think __ata_scsi_queuecmd() will accept new commands.
Kind regards,
Niklas
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-10 8:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-07-10 0:06 [PATCH v2 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10 0:24 ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-10 7:25 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10 8:06 ` Niklas Cassel [this message]
2026-07-10 8:29 ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10 8:48 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10 8:39 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10 7:32 ` Niklas Cassel
2026-07-10 0:06 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] scsi: libsas: " Damien Le Moal
2026-07-10 1:53 ` Jason Yan
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alCoB5FOGJTljbjU@fedora \
--to=cassel@kernel.org \
--cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sashiko-reviews@lists.linux.dev \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox