From: "Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)" <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
To: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: Adam Radford <aradford@gmail.com>,
Adaptec OEM Raid Solutions <aacraid@microsemi.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@infradead.org>,
Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.com>,
Finn Thain <fthain@linux-m68k.org>,
Michael Schmitz <schmitzmic@gmail.com>,
Ram Vegesna <ram.vegesna@broadcom.com>,
Yihang Li <liyihang9@h-partners.com>,
Don Brace <don.brace@microchip.com>,
HighPoint Linux Team <linux@highpoint-tech.com>,
Brian King <brking@us.ibm.com>,
Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Shivasharan S <shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>,
Chandrakanth patil <chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com>,
Jack Wang <jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com>,
Junrui Luo <moonafterrain@outlook.com>,
Kees Cook <kees@kernel.org>, Dave Jiang <dave.jiang@intel.com>,
Giovanni Cabiddu <giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@google.com>,
Lukas Wunner <lukas@wunner.de>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@linutronix.de>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@kernel.org>,
Duoming Zhou <duoming@zju.edu.cn>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
target-devel@vger.kernel.org, storagedev@microchip.com,
megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com,
Markus Schneider-Pargmann <msp@baylibre.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers
Date: Fri, 17 Jul 2026 12:00:27 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <aln8-b9iFDzAPo6V@monoceros> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <aigySpryV0ptiBqr@monoceros>
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1919 bytes --]
On Tue, Jun 09, 2026 at 05:34:40PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> [Dropping Bradley Grove and Michael Reed from Cc: as their addresses
> bounced]
>
> On Wed, Apr 29, 2026 at 12:18:20PM +0200, Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) wrote:
> > ... and PCI device helpers.
> >
> > The various struct pci_device_id arrays were initialized mostly by one
> > of the PCI_DEVICE macros and then list expressions. The latter isn't
> > easily readable if you're not into PCI. Using named initializers is more
> > explicit and thus easier to parse.
> >
> > Also use PCI_DEVICE* helper macros to assign .vendor, .device,
> > .subvendor and .subdevice where appropriate and skip explicit
> > assignments of 0 (which the compiler takes care of).
> >
> > The secret plan is to make struct pci_device_id::driver_data an
> > anonymous union (similar to
> > https://lore.kernel.org/all/cover.1776579304.git.u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com/)
> > and that requires named initializers. But it's also a nice cleanup on
> > its own.
> >
> > This change doesn't introduce changes to the compiled pci_device_id
> > arrays. Tested on x86 and arm64.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) <u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com>
> > ---
> > Hello,
> >
> > the mentioned follow-up quest allows to do
> >
> > - { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3220), .driver_data = (kernel_ulong_t)&hptiop_itl_ops },
> > + { PCI_VDEVICE(TTI, 0x3220), .driver_data_ptr = &hptiop_itl_ops },
> >
> > which gets rid of a bunch of casts and so brings a little bit more type
> > safety. This patch is a preparation for that.
> >
> > I assume a single patch for all of drivers/scsi is fine. If not I can
> > split per driver.
>
> Is this patch still on someone's radar?
Hmm, it seems it isn't? Who is the right person to prod?
FTR: The patch still applies fine to next-20260716.
Best regards
Uwe
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 488 bytes --]
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-07-17 10:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-04-29 10:18 [PATCH] scsi: Consistently define pci_device_ids using named initializers Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-06-09 15:34 ` Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub)
2026-07-17 10:00 ` Uwe Kleine-König (The Capable Hub) [this message]
2026-07-17 10:04 ` Sebastian Andrzej Siewior
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=aln8-b9iFDzAPo6V@monoceros \
--to=u.kleine-koenig@baylibre.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@hansenpartnership.com \
--cc=aacraid@microsemi.com \
--cc=aradford@gmail.com \
--cc=bhelgaas@google.com \
--cc=bigeasy@linutronix.de \
--cc=brking@us.ibm.com \
--cc=chandrakanth.patil@broadcom.com \
--cc=dave.jiang@intel.com \
--cc=don.brace@microchip.com \
--cc=duoming@zju.edu.cn \
--cc=fthain@linux-m68k.org \
--cc=giovanni.cabiddu@intel.com \
--cc=hare@suse.com \
--cc=jinpu.wang@cloud.ionos.com \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=kees@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux@highpoint-tech.com \
--cc=liyihang9@h-partners.com \
--cc=lukas@wunner.de \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=megaraidlinux.pdl@broadcom.com \
--cc=moonafterrain@outlook.com \
--cc=msp@baylibre.com \
--cc=ram.vegesna@broadcom.com \
--cc=schmitzmic@gmail.com \
--cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
--cc=storagedev@microchip.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=tglx@kernel.org \
--cc=willy@infradead.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox