From: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
To: Kashyap Desai <kashyap.desai@broadcom.com>
Cc: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>,
YASUAKI ISHIMATSU <yasu.isimatu@gmail.com>,
Marc Zyngier <marc.zyngier@arm.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
axboe@kernel.dk, mpe@ellerman.id.au, keith.busch@intel.com,
peterz@infradead.org, LKML <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Sumit Saxena <sumit.saxena@broadcom.com>,
Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
<shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com>
Subject: RE: system hung up when offlining CPUs
Date: Wed, 13 Sep 2017 15:33:01 +0200 (CEST) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.DEB.2.20.1709131529400.1874@nanos> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <8cb26204cb5402824496bbb6b636e0af@mail.gmail.com>
On Wed, 13 Sep 2017, Kashyap Desai wrote:
> > On 09/12/2017 08:15 PM, YASUAKI ISHIMATSU wrote:
> > > + linux-scsi and maintainers of megasas
> > >> In my server, IRQ#66-89 are sent to CPU#24-29. And if I offline
> > >> CPU#24-29, I/O does not work, showing the following messages.
....
> > This indeed looks like a problem.
> > We're going to great lengths to submit and complete I/O on the same CPU,
> > so
> > if the CPU is offlined while I/O is in flight we won't be getting a
> > completion for
> > this particular I/O.
> > However, the megasas driver should be able to cope with this situation;
> > after
> > all, the firmware maintains completions queues, so it would be dead easy
> > to
> > look at _other_ completions queues, too, if a timeout occurs.
> In case of IO timeout, megaraid_sas driver is checking other queues as well.
> That is why IO was completed in this case and further IOs were resumed.
>
> Driver complete commands as below code executed from
> megasas_wait_for_outstanding_fusion().
> for (MSIxIndex = 0 ; MSIxIndex < count; MSIxIndex++)
> complete_cmd_fusion(instance, MSIxIndex);
>
> Because of above code executed in driver, we see only one print as below in
> this logs.
> megaraid_sas 0000:02:00.0: [ 0]waiting for 2 commands to complete for scsi0
>
> As per below link CPU hotplug will take care- "All interrupts targeted to
> this CPU are migrated to a new CPU"
> https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/v4.11/core-api/cpu_hotplug.html
>
> BTW - We are also able reproduce this issue locally. Reason for IO timeout
> is -" IO is completed, but corresponding interrupt did not arrived on Online
> CPU. Either missed due to CPU is in transient state of being OFFLINED. I am
> not sure which component should take care this."
>
> Question - "what happens once __cpu_disable is called and some of the queued
> interrupt has affinity to that particular CPU ?"
> I assume ideally those pending/queued Interrupt should be migrated to
> remaining online CPUs. It should not be unhandled if we want to avoid such
> IO timeout.
Can you please provide the following information, before and after
offlining the last CPU in the affinity set:
# cat /proc/irq/$IRQNUM/smp_affinity_list
# cat /proc/irq/$IRQNUM/effective_affinity
# cat /sys/kernel/debug/irq/irqs/$IRQNUM
The last one requires: CONFIG_GENERIC_IRQ_DEBUGFS=y
Thanks,
tglx
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-09-13 13:33 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <c55a33b4-a886-8882-dd8d-5c488f94ee06@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <20170809124213.0d9518bb@why.wild-wind.fr.eu.org>
[not found] ` <cd524af7-1f20-1956-1e44-92a451053387@gmail.com>
[not found] ` <c1c7e0d6-d908-b511-8418-bca288a0d20a@arm.com>
[not found] ` <20170821131809.GA17564@lst.de>
[not found] ` <fce0ad52-8739-09c8-ec9d-a23eb92cec5a@arm.com>
[not found] ` <8e0d76cd-7cd4-3a98-12ba-815f00d4d772@gmail.com>
2017-09-12 18:15 ` system hung up when offlining CPUs YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-09-13 11:13 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-09-13 11:35 ` Kashyap Desai
2017-09-13 13:33 ` Thomas Gleixner [this message]
2017-09-14 16:28 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-09-16 10:15 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-09-16 15:02 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-02 16:36 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-03 21:44 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-04 21:04 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-10 16:30 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-16 18:59 ` YASUAKI ISHIMATSU
2017-10-16 20:27 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-10-30 9:08 ` Shivasharan Srikanteshwara
2017-11-01 0:47 ` Thomas Gleixner
2017-11-01 11:01 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-10-04 21:10 ` Thomas Gleixner
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.DEB.2.20.1709131529400.1874@nanos \
--to=tglx@linutronix.de \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hare@suse.de \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kashyap.desai@broadcom.com \
--cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=marc.zyngier@arm.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=peterz@infradead.org \
--cc=shivasharan.srikanteshwara@broadcom.com \
--cc=sumit.saxena@broadcom.com \
--cc=yasu.isimatu@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox