From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
To: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>
Cc: Chris Clayton <chris2553@googlemail.com>,
Jaswinder Singh Rajput <jaswinder@kernel.org>,
NeilBrown <neilb@suse.de>,
linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, scsi <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
Tejun Heo <tj@kernel.org>,
Arjan van de Ven <arjan@linux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: 2.6.30-rc8 Oops whilst booting
Date: Mon, 8 Jun 2009 10:21:55 -0700 (PDT) [thread overview]
Message-ID: <alpine.LFD.2.01.0906081003370.6847@localhost.localdomain> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1244479879.4079.284.camel@mulgrave.site>
On Mon, 8 Jun 2009, James Bottomley wrote:
>
> The root cause is a reordering of the devices caused by the async code.
That's NULL information.
OF COURSE the root cause is the async code. We know that. We're looking
for the specifics.
In particular, before that commit, at most you will wait for too _much_.
In other words, it's a "good" wait.
Your commit caused it to wait for less, and that then showed a bug. Not
all that surprising - it's now not waiting enough.
You tried to avoid a deadlock situation of waiting for too much, but you
avoided the deadlock by now waiting for too little.
I also think that your code is simply buggy. As far as I can tell, int he
case of having both running and pending events, you'll always pick the
pending cookie. But it's the _running_ cookie that has the lower event
number, isn't it?
I dunno. It all looks very fishy to me.
Linus
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-06-08 17:23 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200906061959.55592.chris2553@googlemail.com>
[not found] ` <200906062215.30571.chris2553@googlemail.com>
[not found] ` <1244381140.30664.12.camel@ht.satnam>
[not found] ` <c6b1100b0906071138g2c46fb34vc1a2beb9438f1f1e@mail.gmail.com>
2009-06-07 22:31 ` 2.6.30-rc8 Oops whilst booting Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-07 22:55 ` NeilBrown
2009-06-08 8:08 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 10:58 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 11:34 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-08 12:53 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 16:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 16:51 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-08 17:06 ` Jaswinder Singh Rajput
2009-06-08 17:45 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 18:21 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 19:17 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 20:03 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 17:21 ` Linus Torvalds [this message]
2009-06-08 17:37 ` Arjan van de Ven
2009-06-08 17:38 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-08 17:06 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-08 17:42 ` Linus Torvalds
2009-06-08 17:49 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-08 18:33 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 14:23 ` James Bottomley
2009-06-08 15:04 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 15:17 ` Chris Clayton
2009-06-08 15:32 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=alpine.LFD.2.01.0906081003370.6847@localhost.localdomain \
--to=torvalds@linux-foundation.org \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=arjan@linux.intel.com \
--cc=chris2553@googlemail.com \
--cc=jaswinder@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=neilb@suse.de \
--cc=tj@kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox