From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-0.8 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5578FC433E0 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3DD23206D7 for ; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 23:29:04 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727951AbgFNX3A (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:29:00 -0400 Received: from kvm5.telegraphics.com.au ([98.124.60.144]:35186 "EHLO kvm5.telegraphics.com.au" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1727928AbgFNX3A (ORCPT ); Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:29:00 -0400 Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by kvm5.telegraphics.com.au (Postfix) with ESMTP id BFEE1272D7; Sun, 14 Jun 2020 19:28:56 -0400 (EDT) Date: Mon, 15 Jun 2020 09:28:56 +1000 (AEST) From: Finn Thain To: Chris Boot cc: Chris Boot , linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, target-devel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux1394-devel@lists.sourceforge.net, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, Bart Van Assche , Chuhong Yuan , "Martin K . Petersen" , Nicholas Bellinger , Stefan Richter Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: target/sbp: remove firewire SBP target driver In-Reply-To: <7ad14946-5c25-fc49-1e48-72d37a607832@boo.tc> Message-ID: References: <01020172acd3d10f-3964f076-a820-43fc-9494-3f3946e9b7b5-000000@eu-west-1.amazonses.com> <7ad14946-5c25-fc49-1e48-72d37a607832@boo.tc> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On Sun, 14 Jun 2020, Chris Boot wrote: > I expect that if someone finds this useful it can stick around (but > that's not my call). Who's call is that? If the patch had said "From: Martin K. Petersen" and "This driver is being removed because it has the following defects..." that would be some indication of a good-faith willingness to accept users as developers in the spirit of the GPL, which is what you seem to be alluding to (?). > I just don't have the time or inclination or hardware to be able to > maintain it anymore, so someone else would have to pick it up. > Which is why most drivers get orphaned, right?