Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, Niklas Cassel <cassel@kernel.org>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
	Jason Yan <yanaijie@huawei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v7 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs
Date: Wed, 22 Jul 2026 21:20:41 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <amGWmbJXLXGxrFso@google.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260721064027.2081195-1-dlemoal@kernel.org>

On Tue, Jul 21, 2026 at 03:40:25PM +0900, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> This patch series fixes libata and libsas to correctly handles deferred
> queued commands in case of a timeout error, to avoid excessive delays in
> waking up the scsi EH task.
> 
> Igor,
> 
> My apologies for the churn, but please retest!

Test results look good! Thank you for all the time and effort that you
spent on this issue. I learned a lot!

Tested-by: Igor Pylypiv <ipylypiv@google.com>

Best,
Igor

> Also, I added your Signed-off-by on patch 2 since half of it is yours.
> 
> Martin,
> 
> Once reviewed, I or you can take both patches ?
> 
> Changes from v6:
>  - In patch 1, go back to using direct command completion for retrying
>    deferred QCs, but adds libata EH trigger to avoid problems with the
>    block layer immediately re-issuing the retried commands. This same
>    method also allows directly handling timed out deferred QCs, which
>    simplifies libata EH.
> 
> Changes from v5:
>  - Reworked patch 1 to have deferred command retries all go through libata
>    EH to ensure that we do not run into issues with the block layer
>    immediately re-issuing retried deffered commands (which would create
>    again the problem we are trying to solve). This change necessitate the
>    introduction of a new QC flag and changes to the completion path for
>    commands to ATAPI devices.
> 
> Changes from v4:
>  - Simplified sas_eh_timed_out() code in patch 2
> 
> Changes from v3:
>  - Reimplement ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() in patch 1 as
>    ata_eh_retry_deferred_qc() so that all requeue pathes use the same
>    function.
> 
> Changes from v2:
>  - Modified patch 1 to avoid the problem reported by Sashiko that requeued
>    deferred QCs may be re-ssued immediately by the block layer, thus
>    potentially keeping the device busy. The modification now relies on
>    libata-EH to perform the requeue instead of immediately doing it from
>    the eh_timed_out operation.
>  - Modified patch 2 to use the new helper function defined in patch 1.
> 
> Changes from v1:
>  - Modified patch 1 to ignore timed out deferred QCs in
>    ata_scsi_requeue_deferred_qc() to let ata_scsi_cmd_error_handler()
>    correctly handle this case.
> 
> Damien Le Moal (2):
>   ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out
>   scsi: libsas: terminate deferred commands on time out
> 
>  drivers/ata/libata-eh.c             |  29 ++------
>  drivers/ata/libata-scsi.c           | 109 +++++++++++++++++++++++++---
>  drivers/ata/libata.h                |   3 +-
>  drivers/scsi/libsas/sas_scsi_host.c |  15 ++++
>  include/linux/libata.h              |   4 +
>  include/scsi/libsas.h               |   2 +
>  6 files changed, 127 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-)
> 
> -- 
> 2.55.0
> 

      parent reply	other threads:[~2026-07-23  4:20 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2026-07-21  6:40 [PATCH v7 0/2] fixup handling of timeouts with deferred QCs Damien Le Moal
2026-07-21  6:40 ` [PATCH v7 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: terminate deferred commands on time out Damien Le Moal
2026-07-21  7:00   ` sashiko-bot
2026-07-21  7:43     ` Damien Le Moal
2026-07-21  6:40 ` [PATCH v7 2/2] scsi: libsas: " Damien Le Moal
2026-07-23  4:20 ` Igor Pylypiv [this message]

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=amGWmbJXLXGxrFso@google.com \
    --to=ipylypiv@google.com \
    --cc=cassel@kernel.org \
    --cc=dlemoal@kernel.org \
    --cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=yanaijie@huawei.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox