From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:41:14 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476800897-19898-7-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
On 2016-10-18 07:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Move the functions' definitions to remove unnecessary
> declarations.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
>
> New patch added in v2 series.
>
> drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 133
> +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
> 1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> index 3a87e88..144b11f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> @@ -22,13 +22,6 @@
> #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MIN_UV 1200000
> #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MAX_UV 1200000
>
> -static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> - const char *, bool);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> - const char *);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common);
> -
> int ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate(struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_calibration *tbl_A,
> int tbl_size_A,
> @@ -75,45 +68,6 @@ out:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate);
>
> -struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> - const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> - struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> -{
> - int err;
> - struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> - struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> - struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> - if (err) {
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> - if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> - if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> - err = PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> - dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> - generic_phy = NULL;
> - goto out;
> - }
> -
> - common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> - common_cfg->dev = dev;
> -
> -out:
> - return generic_phy;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> -
> /*
> * This assumes the embedded phy structure inside generic_phy is of
> type
> * struct ufs_qcom_phy. In order to function properly it's crucial
> @@ -154,6 +108,45 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device
> *pdev,
> return 0;
> }
>
> +struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> + struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> + const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> + struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> +{
> + int err;
> + struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> + struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> + struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> + if (err) {
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev,
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> + if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> + if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> + err = PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> + dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> + generic_phy = NULL;
> + goto out;
> + }
> +
> + common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> + common_cfg->dev = dev;
> +
> +out:
> + return generic_phy;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> +
> static int __ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(struct device *dev,
> const char *name, struct clk **clk_out, bool err_print)
> {
> @@ -224,30 +217,6 @@ out:
> }
> EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks);
>
> -int
> -ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> -{
> - int err;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> - "vdda-pll");
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> - "vdda-phy");
> -
> - if (err)
> - goto out;
> -
> - /* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> - __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> - "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> -out:
> - return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> -
> static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *dev,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, const char *name, bool optional)
> {
> @@ -316,6 +285,30 @@ static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device
> *dev,
> return __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(dev, vreg, name, false);
> }
>
> +int
> +ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> +{
> + int err;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> + "vdda-pll");
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> + "vdda-phy");
> +
> + if (err)
> + goto out;
> +
> + /* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> + __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> + "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> +out:
> + return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> +
> static
> int ufs_qcom_phy_cfg_vreg(struct device *dev,
> struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, bool on)
LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
--
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-10-18 18:41 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-10-18 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:38 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 21:18 ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 17:20 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:21 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-26 20:20 ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-29 20:16 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:41 ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:13 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-19 17:45 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 19:18 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-20 3:44 ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:19 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 0:07 ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-25 0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-25 6:00 ` Vivek Gautam
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org \
--to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=kishon@ti.com \
--cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
--cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).