linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>
To: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
Cc: kishon@ti.com, jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com, vinholikatti@gmail.com,
	martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations
Date: Tue, 18 Oct 2016 11:41:14 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1476800897-19898-7-git-send-email-vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>

On 2016-10-18 07:28, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Move the functions' definitions to remove unnecessary
> declarations.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Vivek Gautam <vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org>
> ---
> 
> New patch added in v2 series.
> 
>  drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c | 133 
> +++++++++++++++++++++------------------------
>  1 file changed, 63 insertions(+), 70 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> index 3a87e88..144b11f 100644
> --- a/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> +++ b/drivers/phy/phy-qcom-ufs.c
> @@ -22,13 +22,6 @@
>  #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MIN_UV        1200000
>  #define VDDP_REF_CLK_MAX_UV        1200000
> 
> -static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> -				    const char *, bool);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *, struct 
> ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *,
> -				  const char *);
> -static int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				  struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common);
> -
>  int ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate(struct ufs_qcom_phy *ufs_qcom_phy,
>  			   struct ufs_qcom_phy_calibration *tbl_A,
>  			   int tbl_size_A,
> @@ -75,45 +68,6 @@ out:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_calibrate);
> 
> -struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> -				struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> -				const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> -				struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> -{
> -	int err;
> -	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> -	struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> -	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> -
> -	err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> -	if (err) {
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, 
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> -	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> -		err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> -	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> -		err =  PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> -		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> -		generic_phy = NULL;
> -		goto out;
> -	}
> -
> -	common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> -	common_cfg->dev = dev;
> -
> -out:
> -	return generic_phy;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> -
>  /*
>   * This assumes the embedded phy structure inside generic_phy is of 
> type
>   * struct ufs_qcom_phy. In order to function properly it's crucial
> @@ -154,6 +108,45 @@ int ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(struct platform_device 
> *pdev,
>  	return 0;
>  }
> 
> +struct phy *ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe(struct platform_device *pdev,
> +				struct ufs_qcom_phy *common_cfg,
> +				const struct phy_ops *ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops,
> +				struct ufs_qcom_phy_specific_ops *phy_spec_ops)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +	struct device *dev = &pdev->dev;
> +	struct phy *generic_phy = NULL;
> +	struct phy_provider *phy_provider;
> +
> +	err = ufs_qcom_phy_base_init(pdev, common_cfg);
> +	if (err) {
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: phy base init failed %d\n", __func__, err);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	phy_provider = devm_of_phy_provider_register(dev, 
> of_phy_simple_xlate);
> +	if (IS_ERR(phy_provider)) {
> +		err = PTR_ERR(phy_provider);
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to register phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	generic_phy = devm_phy_create(dev, NULL, ufs_qcom_phy_gen_ops);
> +	if (IS_ERR(generic_phy)) {
> +		err =  PTR_ERR(generic_phy);
> +		dev_err(dev, "%s: failed to create phy %d\n", __func__, err);
> +		generic_phy = NULL;
> +		goto out;
> +	}
> +
> +	common_cfg->phy_spec_ops = phy_spec_ops;
> +	common_cfg->dev = dev;
> +
> +out:
> +	return generic_phy;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_generic_probe);
> +
>  static int __ufs_qcom_phy_clk_get(struct device *dev,
>  			 const char *name, struct clk **clk_out, bool err_print)
>  {
> @@ -224,30 +217,6 @@ out:
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_clks);
> 
> -int
> -ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> -{
> -	int err;
> -
> -	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> -		"vdda-pll");
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> -		"vdda-phy");
> -
> -	if (err)
> -		goto out;
> -
> -	/* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> -	__ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> -				 "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> -out:
> -	return err;
> -}
> -EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> -
>  static int __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device *dev,
>  		struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, const char *name, bool optional)
>  {
> @@ -316,6 +285,30 @@ static int ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(struct device 
> *dev,
>  	return __ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(dev, vreg, name, false);
>  }
> 
> +int
> +ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators(struct ufs_qcom_phy *phy_common)
> +{
> +	int err;
> +
> +	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_pll,
> +		"vdda-pll");
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	err = ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vdda_phy,
> +		"vdda-phy");
> +
> +	if (err)
> +		goto out;
> +
> +	/* vddp-ref-clk-* properties are optional */
> +	__ufs_qcom_phy_init_vreg(phy_common->dev, &phy_common->vddp_ref_clk,
> +				 "vddp-ref-clk", true);
> +out:
> +	return err;
> +}
> +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(ufs_qcom_phy_init_vregulators);
> +
>  static
>  int ufs_qcom_phy_cfg_vreg(struct device *dev,
>  			  struct ufs_qcom_phy_vreg *vreg, bool on)

LGTM.
Reviewed-by: Subhash Jadavani <subhashj@codeaurora.org>


-- 
The Qualcomm Innovation Center, Inc. is a member of Code Aurora Forum,
a Linux Foundation Collaborative Project

  reply	other threads:[~2016-10-18 18:41 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2016-10-18 14:28 [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 01/10] phy: qcom-ufs: remove failure when rx/tx_iface_clk are absent Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:38   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 21:18   ` Stephen Boyd
2016-10-19 17:20     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-29 20:21       ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 02/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary BUG_ON Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 03/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Use devm sibling of kstrdup for regulator names Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 04/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Discard remove callback for drivers Vivek Gautam
2016-10-26 20:20   ` Kishon Vijay Abraham I
2016-10-29 20:16     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 05/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Cleanup clock and regulator initialization Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 06/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove unnecessary function declarations Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 18:41   ` Subhash Jadavani [this message]
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 07/10] phy: qcom-ufs-qmp-xx: Move clock and regulator init out of phy init Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH 08/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Refactoring phy clock handling Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:13   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-19 17:45     ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19 19:18       ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-20  3:44         ` Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 09/10] scsi/ufs: qcom: Add phy_exit call in hcd exit path Vivek Gautam
2016-10-18 20:19   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-18 14:28 ` [PATCH v2 10/10] phy: qcom-ufs: Remove common layer phy exit callback Vivek Gautam
2016-10-19  0:07   ` Subhash Jadavani
2016-10-25  0:40 ` [PATCH v2 00/10] ufs-qcom: phy/hcd: Clean up qcom-ufs phy and ufs-qcom hcd Martin K. Petersen
2016-10-25  6:00   ` Vivek Gautam

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b06fb270dfd9fbc13a8d7fed998295e4@codeaurora.org \
    --to=subhashj@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=kishon@ti.com \
    --cc=linux-arm-msm@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=vinholikatti@gmail.com \
    --cc=vivek.gautam@codeaurora.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).