From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
Cc: "axboe@kernel.dk" <axboe@kernel.dk>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
"linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>,
Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 01/21] block: add and use init tagset helper
Date: Wed, 5 Oct 2022 05:37:58 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <b2c5d8cd-aee1-d02f-33b4-d424a6db9c55@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <6fee2d7a-7fd1-73ee-2911-87a4ed3e8769@opensource.wdc.com>
On 10/4/22 22:11, Damien Le Moal wrote:
> On 10/5/22 12:22, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> Add and use the helper to initialize the common fields of the tag_set
>> such as blk_mq_ops, number of h/w queues, queue depth, command size,
>> numa_node, timeout, BLK_MQ_F_XXX flags, driver data. This initialization
>> is spread all over the block drivers. This avoids the code repetation of
>> the inialization code of the tag set in current block drivers and any
>
> s/inialization/initialization
> s/repetation/repetition
>
>> future ones.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Chaitanya Kulkarni <kch@nvidia.com>
>> ---
>> block/blk-mq.c | 20 ++++++++++++++++++++
>> drivers/block/null_blk/main.c | 10 +++-------
>> include/linux/blk-mq.h | 5 +++++
>> 3 files changed, 28 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/block/blk-mq.c b/block/blk-mq.c
>> index 8070b6c10e8d..e3a8dd81bbe2 100644
>> --- a/block/blk-mq.c
>> +++ b/block/blk-mq.c
>> @@ -4341,6 +4341,26 @@ static int blk_mq_alloc_tag_set_tags(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> return blk_mq_realloc_tag_set_tags(set, 0, new_nr_hw_queues);
>> }
>>
>> +void blk_mq_init_tag_set(struct blk_mq_tag_set *set,
>> + const struct blk_mq_ops *ops, unsigned int nr_hw_queues,
>> + unsigned int queue_depth, unsigned int cmd_size, int numa_node,
>> + unsigned int timeout, unsigned int flags, void *driver_data)
>
> That is an awful lot of arguments... I would be tempted to say pack all
> these into a struct but then that would kind of negate this patchset goal.
yes..
> Using a function with that many arguments will be error prone, and hard to
> review... Not a fan.
>
Recent addition to the block layer code blk_rq_map_user_io() has 9
arguments:-
int blk_rq_map_user_io(struct request *req, struct rq_map_data
*map_data, void __user *ubuf, unsigned long buf_len,
gfp_t gfp_mask, bool vec, int iov_count, bool check_iter_count,
int rw)
above function also has 9 arguments not more than what is present
in the block tree. I can trim down the argument list probably by
removing the numa_node as it is set to NUMA_NO_NODE for most of the
drivers.
-ck
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-10-05 5:38 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 32+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-10-05 3:22 [RFC PATCH 00/21] block: add and use init tagset helper Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 01/21] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 5:11 ` Damien Le Moal
2022-10-05 5:37 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2022-10-05 9:47 ` Ulf Hansson
2022-10-05 16:54 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-05 17:22 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-06 18:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-06 18:40 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-10-07 19:40 ` Jens Axboe
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 02/21] loop: use lib tagset init helper Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 03/21] nbd: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 04/21] rnbd: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 05/21] bsg-lib: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 06/21] rnbd-clt: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 07/21] virtio-blk: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 08/21] scsi: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 09/21] block: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 10/21] amiflop: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 11/21] floppy: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 12/21] mtip32xx: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 13/21] z3ram: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 14/21] scm_blk: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 15/21] ubi: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 16/21] mmc: core: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 17/21] dasd: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 18/21] nvme-core: use lib tagset init helper for I/O q Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 19/21] nvme-core: use lib tagset init helper for adminq Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 20/21] nvme-apple: use lib tagset init helper Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-05 3:22 ` [RFC PATCH 21/21] nvme-pci: " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2022-10-07 18:26 ` [RFC PATCH 00/21] block: add and use init tagset helper Luis Chamberlain
2022-10-10 7:55 ` Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=b2c5d8cd-aee1-d02f-33b4-d424a6db9c55@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox