Linux SCSI subsystem development
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Damien Le Moal <damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com>
To: John Garry <john.garry@huawei.com>,
	linux-ide@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: libata-sata: Fix device queue depth control
Date: Tue, 27 Sep 2022 23:47:16 +0900	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <b69343eb-617f-04bd-df07-b62a445fbe77@opensource.wdc.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <d2c4a043-e998-db98-1fe1-47b53516d7cc@huawei.com>

On 9/27/22 18:47, John Garry wrote:
> On 27/09/2022 10:28, Damien Le Moal wrote:
>>> Sure, we can use sas_to_ata_dev() to get the ata_device.
>>>
>>> I am just suggesting my way such that we can have a consistent method to
>>> get the ata_device between all libata users and we don't need to change
>>> the ata_change_queue_depth() interface. It would be something like:
>>>
>>> struct ata_device *ata_scsi_find_dev(struct ata_port *ap, const struct
>>> scsi_device *scsidev)
>>> {
>>> 	struct ata_link *link;
>>> 	struct ata_device *dev;
>>>
>>> 	ata_for_each_link(link, ap, EDGE) {
>>> 		ata_for_each_dev(dev, link, ENABLED) {
>>> 			if (scsidev == dev->sdev)
>>> 				return dev;
>>> 		}
>>> 	}
>>> 	// todo: check pmp
>>> 	return NULL;
>>> }
>> I see. Need to think about this one... This may also unify the pmp case.
>> Are you OK with the patch as is though ? 
> 
> I'm ok with your patchset, but let me test it and get back to you later 
> today.
> 
> We can improve with something
>> like the above on top later. Really need to fix that qd setting as it is
>> causing problems for testing devices with/without ncq commands.
> 
> Out of curiosity, are you considering your patchset for 6.0?

Yes. But I can send it for 6.1 with cc: stable too.

> 
>>
> 
> Thanks,
> John

-- 
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research


  reply	other threads:[~2022-09-27 14:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 16+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2022-09-25 23:08 [PATCH v2 0/2] Fixes for ATA device queue depth control Damien Le Moal
2022-09-25 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 1/2] ata: libata-scsi: Fix initialization of device queue depth Damien Le Moal
2022-09-25 23:08 ` [PATCH v2 2/2] ata: libata-sata: Fix device queue depth control Damien Le Moal
2022-09-26 11:31   ` John Garry
2022-09-26 23:05     ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-27  7:05       ` John Garry
2022-09-27  9:28         ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-27  9:47           ` John Garry
2022-09-27 14:47             ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2022-09-27 11:51   ` John Garry
2022-09-27 15:03     ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-27 16:09       ` John Garry
2022-09-27 23:39         ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-28  7:00         ` Damien Le Moal
2022-09-28  7:53           ` John Garry
2022-09-28  9:10             ` Damien Le Moal

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=b69343eb-617f-04bd-df07-b62a445fbe77@opensource.wdc.com \
    --to=damien.lemoal@opensource.wdc.com \
    --cc=john.garry@huawei.com \
    --cc=linux-ide@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox