From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: SF Markus Elfring Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/5] block-cciss: Fine-tuning for two function implementations Date: Sun, 6 Aug 2017 17:00:04 +0200 Message-ID: References: <566ABCD9.1060404@users.sourceforge.net> <686a1f95-a76c-2624-50e1-9d0e59948e64@users.sourceforge.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: In-Reply-To: <686a1f95-a76c-2624-50e1-9d0e59948e64@users.sourceforge.net> Content-Language: en-GB Sender: linux-kernel-owner@vger.kernel.org To: esc.storagedev@microsemi.com, iss_storagedev@hp.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Don Brace Cc: LKML , kernel-janitors@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org > Date: Thu, 18 Aug 2016 11:40:04 +0200 > > Some update suggestions were taken into account > from static source code analysis. > > Markus Elfring (5): > Use memdup_user() > Less function calls after error detection > Delete unnecessary initialisations > Move an assignment for the variable "sg_used" > Replace three kzalloc() calls by kcalloc() > > drivers/block/cciss.c | 66 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------------------- > 1 file changed, 31 insertions(+), 35 deletions(-) How will the clarification be continued for the shown change possibilities? Regards, Markus