public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>
Cc: "James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>, Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>,
	Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-block@vger.kernel.org,
	Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>,
	Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	"Rafael J . Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 5/9] scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door()
Date: Wed, 2 Dec 2020 08:06:10 +0100	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bdadfbcd-76c4-4658-0b36-b7666fa1dc7b@suse.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20201130024615.29171-6-bvanassche@acm.org>

On 11/30/20 3:46 AM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> scsi_eh_lock_door() is the only function in the SCSI error handler that
> calls blk_get_request(). It is not guaranteed that a request is available
> when scsi_eh_lock_door() is called. Hence pass the BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT flag
> to blk_get_request().
> 
> Reviewed-by: Alan Stern <stern@rowland.harvard.edu>
> Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>
> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>
> Cc: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c | 7 ++++++-
>   1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> index d94449188270..6de6e1bf3dcb 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_error.c
> @@ -1993,7 +1993,12 @@ static void scsi_eh_lock_door(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>   	struct request *req;
>   	struct scsi_request *rq;
>   
> -	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue, REQ_OP_SCSI_IN, 0);
> +	/*
> +	 * It is not guaranteed that a request is available nor that
> +	 * sdev->request_queue is unfrozen. Hence the BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT below.
> +	 */
> +	req = blk_get_request(sdev->request_queue, REQ_OP_SCSI_IN,
> +			      BLK_MQ_REQ_NOWAIT);
>   	if (IS_ERR(req))
>   		return;
>   	rq = scsi_req(req);
> 
Well ... had been thinking about that one, too.
The idea of this function is that prior to SCSI EH the device was locked
via scsi_set_medium_removal(). And during SCSI EH the device might have 
become unlocked, so we need to lock it again.
However, scsi_set_medium_removal() not only issues the 
PREVENT_ALLOW_MEDIUM_REMOVAL command, but also sets the 'locked' flag 
based on the result.
So if we fail to get a request here, shouldn't we unset the 'locked' 
flag, too?
And what does happen if we fail here? There is no return value, hence 
SCSI EH might run to completion, and the system will continue
with an unlocked door ...
Not sure if that's a good idea.

But anyway, at the very least unset the 'locked' flag upon failure such 
that the internal state is correctly updated.

_Actually_, the flag should be unset after each successful SCSI EH step, 
to mirror the actual state. But this is probably out of scope for this 
patch.

Cheers,

Hannes
-- 
Dr. Hannes Reinecke                Kernel Storage Architect
hare@suse.de                              +49 911 74053 688
SUSE Software Solutions GmbH, Maxfeldstr. 5, 90409 Nürnberg
HRB 36809 (AG Nürnberg), Geschäftsführer: Felix Imendörffer

  reply	other threads:[~2020-12-02  7:06 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 30+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2020-11-30  2:46 [PATCH v4 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Bart Van Assche
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 1/9] block: Fix a race in the runtime power management code Bart Van Assche
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 2/9] block: Introduce BLK_MQ_REQ_PM Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02  6:50   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 3/9] ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for sense requests Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:29   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02  6:52   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 4/9] ide: Mark power management requests with RQF_PM instead of RQF_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02  6:53   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 5/9] scsi: Do not wait for a request in scsi_eh_lock_door() Bart Van Assche
2020-12-02  7:06   ` Hannes Reinecke [this message]
2020-12-03  5:10     ` Bart Van Assche
2020-12-03  7:18       ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-03  7:27         ` Ming Lei
2020-12-04 16:50           ` Bart Van Assche
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 6/9] scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for domain validation commands Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:31   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 7/9] scsi: Only process PM requests if rpm_status != RPM_ACTIVE Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:32   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02  7:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 8/9] block: Remove RQF_PREEMPT and BLK_MQ_REQ_PREEMPT Bart Van Assche
2020-12-01 11:33   ` Christoph Hellwig
2020-12-02  7:15   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-11-30  2:46 ` [PATCH v4 9/9] block: Do not accept any requests while suspended Bart Van Assche
2020-12-02  7:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2020-12-02  1:51 ` [PATCH v4 0/9] Rework runtime suspend and SPI domain validation Martin K. Petersen
2020-12-06  0:01   ` Jens Axboe
2020-12-08  1:56 ` Martin K. Petersen

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bdadfbcd-76c4-4658-0b36-b7666fa1dc7b@suse.de \
    --to=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=hch@lst.de \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
    --cc=rafael.j.wysocki@intel.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stern@rowland.harvard.edu \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox