Re: [PATCH linux-next] scsi: lpfc: Remove unneeded result variable

[James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>]

On 8/24/2022 12:51 AM, cgel.zte@gmail.com wrote:
> From: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> 
> Return the value from lpfc_issue_reg_vfi() directly instead of storing it
>   in another redundant variable.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@zte.com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: ye xingchen <ye.xingchen@zte.com.cn>
> ---
>   drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c | 5 +----
>   1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 4 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
> index 9be3bb01a8ec..ac0c7ccf2eae 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/lpfc/lpfc_bsg.c
> @@ -1977,8 +1977,6 @@ lpfc_sli4_bsg_set_loopback_mode(struct lpfc_hba *phba, int mode,
>   static int
>   lpfc_sli4_diag_fcport_reg_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>   {
> -	int rc;
> -
>   	if (phba->pport->fc_flag & FC_VFI_REGISTERED) {
>   		lpfc_printf_log(phba, KERN_WARNING, LOG_LIBDFC,
>   				"3136 Port still had vfi registered: "
> @@ -1988,8 +1986,7 @@ lpfc_sli4_diag_fcport_reg_setup(struct lpfc_hba *phba)
>   				phba->vpi_ids[phba->pport->vpi]);
>   		return -EINVAL;
>   	}
> -	rc = lpfc_issue_reg_vfi(phba->pport);
> -	return rc;
> +	return lpfc_issue_reg_vfi(phba->pport);
>   }
>   
>   /**

Thanks

Reviewed-by: James Smart <jsmart2021@gmail.com>

-- james