From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com (canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com [113.46.200.220]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CAE263559F5; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 06:24:36 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.220 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773728679; cv=none; b=FPJ67UFOx6Ao+sDGHmHoEnquhkOyF+gkdsLO93usw8Y/mQekcjN6n1V8RCJRFtxMbJZWhr11vssioPoe/cvRGIyTVzfPbOAkZzvji2XO346M159FCVW1uWgJ/mHeAv5OGkwNvgGWShzHVEFP+RMOU1E770q3gZ+5F+qON0ns38Y= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1773728679; c=relaxed/simple; bh=GjedUynhRQ0OoszqlHV63oJsqymHHHB/b4DaWxO4kZg=; h=Subject:To:References:CC:From:Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=YdE24bjH5bdUY5AM1Eow9+IbtG+MVcRL/De5XWYqUL+9PumC1++tBLy4270zr9FGip3TZv0M5kH3APF2RB+X6Tqq1BA0kGAnnoHUS+Om6Uy19m+6AEWkzFKWZim0hwVBpork2fM6ZzUnazV7mQKcQxS8QoahEaPRoXD9JY3bKyU= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=h-partners.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=h-partners.com; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=h-partners.com header.i=@h-partners.com header.b=Yfv8PkSk; arc=none smtp.client-ip=113.46.200.220 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=quarantine dis=none) header.from=h-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=h-partners.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=h-partners.com header.i=@h-partners.com header.b="Yfv8PkSk" dkim-signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=h-partners.com; s=dkim; c=relaxed/relaxed; q=dns/txt; h=From; bh=IceBJOdOJ0Wo5kaiil1rI3bIeydEAyJ779iXcpPW8ZU=; b=Yfv8PkSkgihcqgAbfVpdFYS2i9Ra2yMWm2yRSanCj8/AYBs5TZWUwMwOSuev/CKWEoH8k0t+m GAP+Vwb7CUePAW1hW4DrvivVqB5JCp6zU53nAfWDnP0v/JPxrPhPL/FDLpOCtc4jQxvJ8JhxJZT AmsyssgQUKYCj1IbkqD+2AY= Received: from mail.maildlp.com (unknown [172.19.163.104]) by canpmsgout05.his.huawei.com (SkyGuard) with ESMTPS id 4fZhcP5mpDz12LdJ; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:19:01 +0800 (CST) Received: from kwepemh200005.china.huawei.com (unknown [7.202.181.112]) by mail.maildlp.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D2499404AD; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:24:33 +0800 (CST) Received: from [10.67.120.126] (10.67.120.126) by kwepemh200005.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.112) with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384) id 15.2.1544.11; Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:24:33 +0800 Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: Fix the maximum channel scanning issue To: Bart Van Assche , Yihang Li , , , References: <20260313023057.4151105-1-liyihang9@huawei.com> <6103e5cd-12e2-4527-8aee-985c2a75f255@acm.org> CC: , , , , From: Yihang Li Message-ID: Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2026 14:24:32 +0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.7.1 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <6103e5cd-12e2-4527-8aee-985c2a75f255@acm.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-ClientProxiedBy: kwepems200002.china.huawei.com (7.221.188.68) To kwepemh200005.china.huawei.com (7.202.181.112) Hi, Bart On 2026/3/17 1:22, Bart Van Assche wrote: > On 3/12/26 7:30 PM, Yihang Li wrote: >> Fix and support specifying the scan shost->max_channel for scanning. > > A more specific prefix than "scsi:" should be used for SAS patches. In > the kernel log I found the following examples: > * scsi: transport: sas: > * scsi: scsi_transport_sas: > > I'm not sure what prefix is preferred. Thank you for your reply. I will carefully consider this suggestion. Thanks, Yihang