public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: cang@codeaurora.org
Cc: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
	"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
	Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
	stummala@codeaurora.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
	linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
	Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:49:14 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <beab3391-a86a-fb8f-0f10-e3bfcd1211d2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0101016e7ca0e791-30050d63-c260-4cc3-a12b-658b7aa70031-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>

On 11/17/19 7:49 PM, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> After this point, dev commands can be sent on hba->cmd_queue.
> But there are multiple entries which users can send dev commands through in ufs-sysfs.c.
> So the clock scaling sequence lost its protection from being disturbed.

Hi Can,

My understanding of the current implementation (Martin's 5.5/scsi-queue branch)
is that hba->clk_scaling_lock serializes clock scaling and submission of SCSI
and device commands but not the submission of TMFs. I think that the following
call chain allows user space to submit TMFs while clock scaling is in progress:

submit UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ on an UFS BSG queue
-> ufs_bsg_request()
   -> ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(msgcode = UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ)
     -> ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd()
       -> __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd()

Is that a feature or is that rather unintended behavior?

Anyway, can you have a look at the patch below and verify whether it preserves
existing behavior?

Thank you,

Bart.


Subject: [PATCH] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation

Scaling the clock is only safe while no commands are in progress. The
current clock scaling implementation uses hba->clk_scaling_lock to
serialize clock scaling against the following three functions:
* ufshcd_queuecommand()          (uses sdev->request_queue)
* ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd()          (uses hba->cmd_queue)
* ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd() (uses hba->cmd_queue)

__ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), which uses hba->tmf_queue, is not serialized
against clock scaling.

Use blk_mq_{un,}freeze_queue() to block submission of new commands and to
wait for ongoing commands to complete. This patch removes a semaphore
down and up operation pair from the hot path.

Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 116 +++++++++++---------------------------
  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h |   1 -
  2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 5314e8bfeeb6..46950cc87dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -971,65 +971,6 @@ static bool ufshcd_is_devfreq_scaling_required(struct ufs_hba *hba,
  	return false;
  }

-static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
-					u64 wait_timeout_us)
-{
-	unsigned long flags;
-	int ret = 0;
-	u32 tm_doorbell;
-	u32 tr_doorbell;
-	bool timeout = false, do_last_check = false;
-	ktime_t start;
-
-	ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
-	spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-	/*
-	 * Wait for all the outstanding tasks/transfer requests.
-	 * Verify by checking the doorbell registers are clear.
-	 */
-	start = ktime_get();
-	do {
-		if (hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL) {
-			ret = -EBUSY;
-			goto out;
-		}
-
-		tm_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
-		tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
-		if (!tm_doorbell && !tr_doorbell) {
-			timeout = false;
-			break;
-		} else if (do_last_check) {
-			break;
-		}
-
-		spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-		schedule();
-		if (ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) >
-		    wait_timeout_us) {
-			timeout = true;
-			/*
-			 * We might have scheduled out for long time so make
-			 * sure to check if doorbells are cleared by this time
-			 * or not.
-			 */
-			do_last_check = true;
-		}
-		spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-	} while (tm_doorbell || tr_doorbell);
-
-	if (timeout) {
-		dev_err(hba->dev,
-			"%s: timedout waiting for doorbell to clear (tm=0x%x, tr=0x%x)\n",
-			__func__, tm_doorbell, tr_doorbell);
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-	}
-out:
-	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
-	ufshcd_release(hba);
-	return ret;
-}
-
  /**
   * ufshcd_scale_gear - scale up/down UFS gear
   * @hba: per adapter instance
@@ -1079,27 +1020,50 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)

  static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  {
-	#define DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US		(1000 * 1000) /* 1 sec */
-	int ret = 0;
+	unsigned long deadline = jiffies + HZ;
+	struct scsi_device *sdev;
+	int res = 0;
+
  	/*
  	 * make sure that there are no outstanding requests when
  	 * clock scaling is in progress
  	 */
-	ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
-	down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-	if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US)) {
-		ret = -EBUSY;
-		up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-		ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
+	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+		blk_freeze_queue_start(sdev->request_queue);
+	blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->cmd_queue);
+	blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->tmf_queue);
+	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
+		if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(sdev->request_queue,
+				max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0) {
+			goto err;
+		}
  	}
+	if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->cmd_queue,
+				max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0)
+		goto err;
+	if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->tmf_queue,
+				max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0)
+		goto err;

-	return ret;
+out:
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->tmf_queue);
+	return res;
+
+err:
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
+	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
+	res = -ETIMEDOUT;
+	goto out;
  }

  static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
  {
-	up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-	ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
+	struct scsi_device *sdev;
+
+	blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
+	shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+		blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
  }

  /**
@@ -2394,9 +2358,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
  		BUG();
  	}

-	if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
-		return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
-
  	spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
  	switch (hba->ufshcd_state) {
  	case UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL:
@@ -2462,7 +2423,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
  out_unlock:
  	spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
  out:
-	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
  	return err;
  }

@@ -2616,8 +2576,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
  	struct completion wait;
  	unsigned long flags;

-	down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
  	/*
  	 * Get free slot, sleep if slots are unavailable.
  	 * Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
@@ -2653,7 +2611,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,

  out_put_tag:
  	blk_put_request(req);
-	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
  	return err;
  }

@@ -5771,8 +5728,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
  	unsigned long flags;
  	u32 upiu_flags;

-	down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
  	req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, 0);
  	if (IS_ERR(req))
  		return PTR_ERR(req);
@@ -5854,7 +5809,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
  	}

  	blk_put_request(req);
-	up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
  	return err;
  }

@@ -8323,8 +8277,6 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
  	/* Initialize mutex for device management commands */
  	mutex_init(&hba->dev_cmd.lock);

-	init_rwsem(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
  	ufshcd_init_clk_gating(hba);

  	ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(hba);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 5865e16f53a6..5ebb920ae874 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -724,7 +724,6 @@ struct ufs_hba {
  	enum bkops_status urgent_bkops_lvl;
  	bool is_urgent_bkops_lvl_checked;

-	struct rw_semaphore clk_scaling_lock;
  	struct ufs_desc_size desc_size;
  	atomic_t scsi_block_reqs_cnt;


  parent reply	other threads:[~2019-11-18 17:49 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-11-12 17:37 [PATCH v5 0/4] Simplify and optimize the UFS driver Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ufs: Serialize error handling and command submission Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ufs: Avoid busy-waiting by eliminating tag conflicts Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to allocate and free TMFs Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation Bart Van Assche
2019-11-13  0:11   ` cang
2019-11-13  0:55     ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-13 16:03       ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2019-11-14 16:11         ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-15  6:01           ` Can Guo
2019-11-15 16:23             ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-18  3:49               ` cang
     [not found]               ` <0101016e7ca0e791-30050d63-c260-4cc3-a12b-658b7aa70031-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-18 17:49                 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-11-18 18:13             ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-19  5:33               ` cang
     [not found]               ` <0101016e822696b5-d1c358be-a0a2-4ef6-b04d-627c1fb361f8-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-19 23:16                 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-20  3:38                   ` cang
     [not found]                   ` <0101016e86e3a961-1840fd1c-d71b-434a-8392-f62d7ece8b0f-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-20 17:58                     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=beab3391-a86a-fb8f-0f10-e3bfcd1211d2@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
    --cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
    --cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
    --cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
    --cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
    --cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox