From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: cang@codeaurora.org
Cc: "Bean Huo (beanhuo)" <beanhuo@micron.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
stummala@codeaurora.org, Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [EXT] Re: [PATCH v5 4/4] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation
Date: Mon, 18 Nov 2019 09:49:14 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <beab3391-a86a-fb8f-0f10-e3bfcd1211d2@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <0101016e7ca0e791-30050d63-c260-4cc3-a12b-658b7aa70031-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
On 11/17/19 7:49 PM, cang@codeaurora.org wrote:
> After this point, dev commands can be sent on hba->cmd_queue.
> But there are multiple entries which users can send dev commands through in ufs-sysfs.c.
> So the clock scaling sequence lost its protection from being disturbed.
Hi Can,
My understanding of the current implementation (Martin's 5.5/scsi-queue branch)
is that hba->clk_scaling_lock serializes clock scaling and submission of SCSI
and device commands but not the submission of TMFs. I think that the following
call chain allows user space to submit TMFs while clock scaling is in progress:
submit UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ on an UFS BSG queue
-> ufs_bsg_request()
-> ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd(msgcode = UPIU_TRANSACTION_TASK_REQ)
-> ufshcd_exec_raw_upiu_cmd()
-> __ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd()
Is that a feature or is that rather unintended behavior?
Anyway, can you have a look at the patch below and verify whether it preserves
existing behavior?
Thank you,
Bart.
Subject: [PATCH] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation
Scaling the clock is only safe while no commands are in progress. The
current clock scaling implementation uses hba->clk_scaling_lock to
serialize clock scaling against the following three functions:
* ufshcd_queuecommand() (uses sdev->request_queue)
* ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd() (uses hba->cmd_queue)
* ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd() (uses hba->cmd_queue)
__ufshcd_issue_tm_cmd(), which uses hba->tmf_queue, is not serialized
against clock scaling.
Use blk_mq_{un,}freeze_queue() to block submission of new commands and to
wait for ongoing commands to complete. This patch removes a semaphore
down and up operation pair from the hot path.
Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
Cc: Tomas Winkler <tomas.winkler@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
---
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 116 +++++++++++---------------------------
drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h | 1 -
2 files changed, 34 insertions(+), 83 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
index 5314e8bfeeb6..46950cc87dc5 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
@@ -971,65 +971,6 @@ static bool ufshcd_is_devfreq_scaling_required(struct ufs_hba *hba,
return false;
}
-static int ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(struct ufs_hba *hba,
- u64 wait_timeout_us)
-{
- unsigned long flags;
- int ret = 0;
- u32 tm_doorbell;
- u32 tr_doorbell;
- bool timeout = false, do_last_check = false;
- ktime_t start;
-
- ufshcd_hold(hba, false);
- spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
- /*
- * Wait for all the outstanding tasks/transfer requests.
- * Verify by checking the doorbell registers are clear.
- */
- start = ktime_get();
- do {
- if (hba->ufshcd_state != UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- goto out;
- }
-
- tm_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TASK_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
- tr_doorbell = ufshcd_readl(hba, REG_UTP_TRANSFER_REQ_DOOR_BELL);
- if (!tm_doorbell && !tr_doorbell) {
- timeout = false;
- break;
- } else if (do_last_check) {
- break;
- }
-
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
- schedule();
- if (ktime_to_us(ktime_sub(ktime_get(), start)) >
- wait_timeout_us) {
- timeout = true;
- /*
- * We might have scheduled out for long time so make
- * sure to check if doorbells are cleared by this time
- * or not.
- */
- do_last_check = true;
- }
- spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
- } while (tm_doorbell || tr_doorbell);
-
- if (timeout) {
- dev_err(hba->dev,
- "%s: timedout waiting for doorbell to clear (tm=0x%x, tr=0x%x)\n",
- __func__, tm_doorbell, tr_doorbell);
- ret = -EBUSY;
- }
-out:
- spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
- ufshcd_release(hba);
- return ret;
-}
-
/**
* ufshcd_scale_gear - scale up/down UFS gear
* @hba: per adapter instance
@@ -1079,27 +1020,50 @@ static int ufshcd_scale_gear(struct ufs_hba *hba, bool scale_up)
static int ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
- #define DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US (1000 * 1000) /* 1 sec */
- int ret = 0;
+ unsigned long deadline = jiffies + HZ;
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+ int res = 0;
+
/*
* make sure that there are no outstanding requests when
* clock scaling is in progress
*/
- ufshcd_scsi_block_requests(hba);
- down_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
- if (ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr(hba, DOORBELL_CLR_TOUT_US)) {
- ret = -EBUSY;
- up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
- ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
+ shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+ blk_freeze_queue_start(sdev->request_queue);
+ blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->cmd_queue);
+ blk_freeze_queue_start(hba->tmf_queue);
+ shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host) {
+ if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(sdev->request_queue,
+ max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0) {
+ goto err;
+ }
}
+ if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->cmd_queue,
+ max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0)
+ goto err;
+ if (blk_mq_freeze_queue_wait_timeout(hba->tmf_queue,
+ max_t(long, 0, deadline - jiffies)) <= 0)
+ goto err;
- return ret;
+out:
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->tmf_queue);
+ return res;
+
+err:
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
+ shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
+ res = -ETIMEDOUT;
+ goto out;
}
static void ufshcd_clock_scaling_unprepare(struct ufs_hba *hba)
{
- up_write(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
- ufshcd_scsi_unblock_requests(hba);
+ struct scsi_device *sdev;
+
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(hba->cmd_queue);
+ shost_for_each_device(sdev, hba->host)
+ blk_mq_unfreeze_queue(sdev->request_queue);
}
/**
@@ -2394,9 +2358,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
BUG();
}
- if (!down_read_trylock(&hba->clk_scaling_lock))
- return SCSI_MLQUEUE_HOST_BUSY;
-
spin_lock_irqsave(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
switch (hba->ufshcd_state) {
case UFSHCD_STATE_OPERATIONAL:
@@ -2462,7 +2423,6 @@ static int ufshcd_queuecommand(struct Scsi_Host *host, struct scsi_cmnd *cmd)
out_unlock:
spin_unlock_irqrestore(hba->host->host_lock, flags);
out:
- up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
return err;
}
@@ -2616,8 +2576,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
struct completion wait;
unsigned long flags;
- down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
/*
* Get free slot, sleep if slots are unavailable.
* Even though we use wait_event() which sleeps indefinitely,
@@ -2653,7 +2611,6 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
out_put_tag:
blk_put_request(req);
- up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
return err;
}
@@ -5771,8 +5728,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
unsigned long flags;
u32 upiu_flags;
- down_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
req = blk_get_request(q, REQ_OP_DRV_OUT, 0);
if (IS_ERR(req))
return PTR_ERR(req);
@@ -5854,7 +5809,6 @@ static int ufshcd_issue_devman_upiu_cmd(struct ufs_hba *hba,
}
blk_put_request(req);
- up_read(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
return err;
}
@@ -8323,8 +8277,6 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
/* Initialize mutex for device management commands */
mutex_init(&hba->dev_cmd.lock);
- init_rwsem(&hba->clk_scaling_lock);
-
ufshcd_init_clk_gating(hba);
ufshcd_init_clk_scaling(hba);
diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
index 5865e16f53a6..5ebb920ae874 100644
--- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
+++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.h
@@ -724,7 +724,6 @@ struct ufs_hba {
enum bkops_status urgent_bkops_lvl;
bool is_urgent_bkops_lvl_checked;
- struct rw_semaphore clk_scaling_lock;
struct ufs_desc_size desc_size;
atomic_t scsi_block_reqs_cnt;
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2019-11-18 17:49 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2019-11-12 17:37 [PATCH v5 0/4] Simplify and optimize the UFS driver Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 1/4] ufs: Serialize error handling and command submission Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 2/4] ufs: Avoid busy-waiting by eliminating tag conflicts Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 3/4] ufs: Use blk_{get,put}_request() to allocate and free TMFs Bart Van Assche
2019-11-12 17:37 ` [PATCH v5 4/4] ufs: Simplify the clock scaling mechanism implementation Bart Van Assche
2019-11-13 0:11 ` cang
2019-11-13 0:55 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-13 16:03 ` [EXT] " Bean Huo (beanhuo)
2019-11-14 16:11 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-15 6:01 ` Can Guo
2019-11-15 16:23 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-18 3:49 ` cang
[not found] ` <0101016e7ca0e791-30050d63-c260-4cc3-a12b-658b7aa70031-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-18 17:49 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2019-11-18 18:13 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-19 5:33 ` cang
[not found] ` <0101016e822696b5-d1c358be-a0a2-4ef6-b04d-627c1fb361f8-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-19 23:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2019-11-20 3:38 ` cang
[not found] ` <0101016e86e3a961-1840fd1c-d71b-434a-8392-f62d7ece8b0f-000000@us-west-2.amazonses.com>
2019-11-20 17:58 ` Bart Van Assche
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=beab3391-a86a-fb8f-0f10-e3bfcd1211d2@acm.org \
--to=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=stummala@codeaurora.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox