From: Tyrel Datwyler <tyreld@linux.ibm.com>
To: davemarq@linux.ibm.com,
"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Madhavan Srinivasan <maddy@linux.ibm.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@ellerman.id.au>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@gmail.com>,
"Christophe Leroy (CS GROUP)" <chleroy@kernel.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org, Brian King <brking@linux.ibm.com>,
Greg Joyce <gjoyce@linux.ibm.com>,
Kyle Mahlkuch <kmahlkuc@linux.ibm.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/7] ibmvfc: make ibmvfc login to fabric
Date: Fri, 12 Jun 2026 16:11:50 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bfb7ff08-e4ec-46a2-b368-12d5c77f0ee4@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20260608-ibmvfc-fpin-support-v2-3-d41f540fba5c@linux.ibm.com>
On 6/8/26 11:30 AM, Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay wrote:
> From: Dave Marquardt <davemarq@linux.ibm.com>
>
> Add support for fabric login in order to support the asynchronous
> event queue with its own interrupt as required by NPIV specification
> to support the asynchronous sub-queue and interrupt in order to
> support full and extended FPIN messages.
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c | 94 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
> drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.h | 16 +++++++
> 2 files changed, 106 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> index 88386d7c9106..a18861808325 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ibmvscsi/ibmvfc.c
> @@ -5244,6 +5244,86 @@ static void ibmvfc_discover_targets(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> ibmvfc_link_down(vhost, IBMVFC_LINK_DEAD);
> }
>
> +static void ibmvfc_fabric_login_done(struct ibmvfc_event *evt)
> +{
> + struct ibmvfc_fabric_login *rsp = &evt->xfer_iu->fabric_login;
> + u32 mad_status = be16_to_cpu(rsp->common.status);
> + struct ibmvfc_host *vhost = evt->vhost;
> + int level = IBMVFC_DEFAULT_LOG_LEVEL;
> +
> + ENTER;
> +
> + switch (mad_status) {
> + case IBMVFC_MAD_SUCCESS:
> + fc_host_port_id(vhost->host) = be64_to_cpu(rsp->nport_id);
> + ibmvfc_free_event(evt);
> + break;
> +
> + case IBMVFC_MAD_FAILED:
> + if (ibmvfc_retry_cmd(be16_to_cpu(rsp->status), be16_to_cpu(rsp->error)))
> + level += ibmvfc_retry_host_init(vhost);
> + else
> + ibmvfc_link_down(vhost, IBMVFC_LINK_DEAD);
> + ibmvfc_log(vhost, level, "Fabric Login failed: %s (%x:%x)\n",
> + ibmvfc_get_cmd_error(be16_to_cpu(rsp->status), be16_to_cpu(rsp->error)),
> + be16_to_cpu(rsp->status), be16_to_cpu(rsp->error));
> + ibmvfc_free_event(evt);
> + LEAVE;
> + return;
> +
> + case IBMVFC_MAD_CRQ_ERROR:
> + ibmvfc_retry_host_init(vhost);
> + fallthrough;
> +
> + case IBMVFC_MAD_DRIVER_FAILED:
> + ibmvfc_free_event(evt);
> + LEAVE;
> + return;
> +
> + default:
> + dev_err(vhost->dev, "Invalid fabric Login response: 0x%x\n", mad_status);
> + ibmvfc_link_down(vhost, IBMVFC_LINK_DEAD);
> + ibmvfc_free_event(evt);
> + LEAVE;
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ibmvfc_set_host_action(vhost, IBMVFC_HOST_ACTION_QUERY);
> + wake_up(&vhost->work_wait_q);
> +
> + LEAVE;
> +}
> +
> +static void ibmvfc_fabric_login(struct ibmvfc_host *vhost)
> +{
> + struct ibmvfc_fabric_login *mad;
> + struct ibmvfc_event *evt = ibmvfc_get_reserved_event(&vhost->crq);
> + int level = IBMVFC_DEFAULT_LOG_LEVEL;
> +
> + if (!evt) {
> + ibmvfc_log(vhost, level, "Fabric Login failed: no available events\n");
> + ibmvfc_hard_reset_host(vhost);
> + return;
> + }
> +
> + ibmvfc_init_event(evt, ibmvfc_fabric_login_done, IBMVFC_MAD_FORMAT);
> + mad = &evt->iu.fabric_login;
> + memset(mad, 0, sizeof(*mad));
> + if (vhost->scsi_scrqs.protocol == IBMVFC_PROTO_SCSI)
> + mad->common.opcode = cpu_to_be32(IBMVFC_FABRIC_LOGIN);
> + else {
> + ibmvfc_log(vhost, level, "Fabric Login failed: unknown protocol\n");
> + return;
> + }
This check is pretty pedantic. Seeing as you are directly referencing the scsi
sub-crqs. The protocol field exists so we can pass the sub-crqs blindly and the
code once NVMf comes along can determine the protocol.
Also, if somehow this was ever possibly the case you would leak the event
structure. I think we can drop the check all together.
-Tyrel
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2026-06-12 23:12 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 10+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2026-06-08 18:30 [PATCH v2 0/7] ibmvfc: make ibmvfc support FPIN messages Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 1/7] ibmvfc: add basic FPIN support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-12 22:35 ` Tyrel Datwyler
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 2/7] ibmvfc: Add NOOP command support Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 3/7] ibmvfc: make ibmvfc login to fabric Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-12 23:11 ` Tyrel Datwyler [this message]
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 4/7] ibmvfc: define asynchronous sub-queue Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 5/7] ibmvfc: allocate " Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 6/7] ibmvfc: register and use " Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
2026-06-08 18:30 ` [PATCH v2 7/7] ibmvfc: handle extended FPIN events Dave Marquardt via B4 Relay
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bfb7ff08-e4ec-46a2-b368-12d5c77f0ee4@linux.ibm.com \
--to=tyreld@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
--cc=brking@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=chleroy@kernel.org \
--cc=davemarq@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=gjoyce@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=kmahlkuc@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org \
--cc=maddy@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=mpe@ellerman.id.au \
--cc=npiggin@gmail.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox