* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-08 19:06 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-08 23:56 ` bugme-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-08 19:06 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |dan.j.williams@gmail.com
------- Comment #1 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-05-08 12:06 -------
Regressions list annotation:
Handled-By : Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@intel.com>
Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=121001065404056&w=2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
2008-05-08 19:06 ` [Bug 10622] " bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-08 23:56 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-09 12:43 ` bugme-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-08 23:56 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
------- Comment #2 from dan.j.williams@intel.com 2008-05-08 16:55 -------
The patch at http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=121001065404056&w=2 addresses a
different issue: "WARNING: at include/linux/blkdev.h:443"
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
2008-05-08 19:06 ` [Bug 10622] " bugme-daemon
2008-05-08 23:56 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-09 12:43 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-24 21:21 ` bugme-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-09 12:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
------- Comment #3 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-05-09 05:43 -------
Regressions list annotation:
Ignore-Patch : http://marc.info/?l=linux-raid&m=121001065404056&w=2
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-09 12:43 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-24 21:21 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-24 21:21 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
------- Comment #4 from rjw@sisk.pl 2008-05-24 14:21 -------
James Bottomley said:
"I've been unable to get the reporter to respond to basic debugging
inquiries about this. Without that information, my best guess is that
it's a kmalloc failure that ordinarily would be a mm issue. However,
given that there have been no other reports of this, I suspect it might
be some type of one off error.
I'd downgrade the severity to not reproducible and kill it unless any
further information comes along."
References : http://lkml.org/lkml/2008/5/22/485
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-24 21:21 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-24 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |REJECTED
Resolution| |UNREPRODUCIBLE
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread* [Bug 10622] [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe()
2008-05-08 18:59 [Bug 10622] New: [BUG 2.6.26-rc1] scsi (or sysfs or vm?) oops in sr_probe() bugme-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
@ 2008-05-24 21:22 ` bugme-daemon
5 siblings, 0 replies; 7+ messages in thread
From: bugme-daemon @ 2008-05-24 21:22 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
http://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=10622
rjw@sisk.pl changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|REJECTED |CLOSED
--
Configure bugmail: http://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 7+ messages in thread