* Re: [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-09 21:31 ` James Bottomley
2010-05-09 22:08 ` [Bug 15950] " bugzilla-daemon
` (9 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: James Bottomley @ 2010-05-09 21:31 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugzilla-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 21:19 +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> I'm not sure when this problem started, but it's somewhere in the 2.6.2x
> region.
>
> I'd be happy to recompile, test and debug if needed.
Retesting isn't necessary. There have only been nine changes to that
driver in 2.6.2x. The versions of interest (as in works/doesn't work)
should be
2.6.26 (should be identical to 2.6.31, so just a something else changed
sanity check)
2.6.25 (lots of pointless changes + sense buffer replacement)
2.6.34 (pid removal and sg chaining)
2.6.23 (accessors change)
2.6.22 (spelling only fix!)
James
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-09 21:31 ` James Bottomley
@ 2010-05-09 22:08 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-10 4:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (8 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-05-09 22:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #1 from Anonymous Emailer <anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org> 2010-05-09 22:07:58 ---
Reply-To: James.Bottomley@suse.de
On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 21:19 +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
wrote:
> I'm not sure when this problem started, but it's somewhere in the 2.6.2x
> region.
>
> I'd be happy to recompile, test and debug if needed.
Retesting isn't necessary. There have only been nine changes to that
driver in 2.6.2x. The versions of interest (as in works/doesn't work)
should be
2.6.26 (should be identical to 2.6.31, so just a something else changed
sanity check)
2.6.25 (lots of pointless changes + sense buffer replacement)
2.6.34 (pid removal and sg chaining)
2.6.23 (accessors change)
2.6.22 (spelling only fix!)
James
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-09 21:31 ` James Bottomley
2010-05-09 22:08 ` [Bug 15950] " bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-10 4:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-10 18:26 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
2010-05-10 5:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (7 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 1 reply; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-05-10 4:16 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #2 from ltskinol@gmail.com 2010-05-10 04:16:03 ---
I downloaded the .1 versions of kernel's 2.6.22 through 2.6.26, and
found that 2.6.25 and above had no changes in the dc395x.c file, but
that a variety of changes were introduced in 2.6.24 and below. Since
the older dc395x.c doesn't drop into my current 2.6.31 kernel, I tried
recompiling and running 2.6.24 without success. On Gentoo, the
current udev doesn't work with that older kernel, so things like
networking and X fail to run properly and I was unable to test the
scanner. Suggestions?
Tom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* Re: [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-10 4:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-10 18:26 ` Guennadi Liakhovetski
0 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: Guennadi Liakhovetski @ 2010-05-10 18:26 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: bugzilla-daemon; +Cc: linux-scsi
On Mon, 10 May 2010, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> I downloaded the .1 versions of kernel's 2.6.22 through 2.6.26, and
> found that 2.6.25 and above had no changes in the dc395x.c file, but
> that a variety of changes were introduced in 2.6.24 and below. Since
> the older dc395x.c doesn't drop into my current 2.6.31 kernel, I tried
> recompiling and running 2.6.24 without success. On Gentoo, the
> current udev doesn't work with that older kernel, so things like
> networking and X fail to run properly and I was unable to test the
> scanner. Suggestions?
You can use the command-line sane interface scanimage (from the sane-utils
package).
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (2 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-10 4:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-10 5:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-10 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (6 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-05-10 5:14 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #3 from ltskinol@gmail.com 2010-05-10 05:14:36 ---
On Sun, May 9, 2010 at 6:07 PM, <bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org> wrote:
> https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
>
>
>
>
>
> --- Comment #1 from Anonymous Emailer <anonymous@kernel-bugs.osdl.org> 2010-05-09 22:07:58 ---
> Reply-To: James.Bottomley@suse.de
>
> On Sun, 2010-05-09 at 21:19 +0000, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
> wrote:
>> I'm not sure when this problem started, but it's somewhere in the 2.6.2x
>> region.
>>
>> I'd be happy to recompile, test and debug if needed.
>
> Retesting isn't necessary. There have only been nine changes to that
> driver in 2.6.2x. The versions of interest (as in works/doesn't work)
> should be
>
> 2.6.26 (should be identical to 2.6.31, so just a something else changed
> sanity check)
> 2.6.25 (lots of pointless changes + sense buffer replacement)
> 2.6.34 (pid removal and sg chaining)
> 2.6.23 (accessors change)
> 2.6.22 (spelling only fix!)
>
> James
>
> --
> Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
> ------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
> You reported the bug.
>
I downloaded the .1 versions of kernel's 2.6.22 through 2.6.26, and
found that 2.6.25 and above had no changes in the dc395x.c file, but
that a variety of changes were introduced in 2.6.24 and below. Since
the older dc395x.c doesn't drop into my current 2.6.31 kernel, I tried
recompiling and running 2.6.24 without success. On Gentoo, the
current udev doesn't work with that older kernel, so things like
networking and X fail to run properly and I was unable to test the
scanner. Suggestions?
Tom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (3 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-10 5:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-10 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
2010-05-16 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (5 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-05-10 20:28 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #4 from Guennadi Liakhovetski <g.liakhovetski@gmx.de> 2010-05-10 19:59:25 ---
On Mon, 10 May 2010, bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> I downloaded the .1 versions of kernel's 2.6.22 through 2.6.26, and
> found that 2.6.25 and above had no changes in the dc395x.c file, but
> that a variety of changes were introduced in 2.6.24 and below. Since
> the older dc395x.c doesn't drop into my current 2.6.31 kernel, I tried
> recompiling and running 2.6.24 without success. On Gentoo, the
> current udev doesn't work with that older kernel, so things like
> networking and X fail to run properly and I was unable to test the
> scanner. Suggestions?
You can use the command-line sane interface scanimage (from the sane-utils
package).
Thanks
Guennadi
---
Guennadi Liakhovetski, Ph.D.
Freelance Open-Source Software Developer
http://www.open-technology.de/
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (4 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-10 20:28 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2010-05-16 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 18:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (4 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2010-05-16 3:49 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
ltskinol@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Regression|Yes |No
--- Comment #5 from ltskinol@gmail.com 2010-05-16 03:49:14 ---
Guennadi - good call.
I was able to go back to kernel 2.6.22.1 (through 2.6.25/24/23) and all
versions exhibit the same behavior. With the command-line scanimage software,
I eventually see an error returned and the driver resets after a two minute
delay.
I've removed the regression flag from this bug, but still think there's a
problem.
Tom
--
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (5 preceding siblings ...)
2010-05-16 3:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 18:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 19:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (3 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
CC| |alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk
Resolution|--- |OBSOLETE
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (6 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-10 18:29 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 19:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
` (2 subsequent siblings)
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 19:51 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
ltskinol@gmail.com changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|RESOLVED |REOPENED
Resolution|OBSOLETE |---
--- Comment #6 from ltskinol@gmail.com ---
Reopening. Not obsolete. Reproduceable in 3.5.3, which is what I'm using at
present. (I can upgrade to a newer version if need-be.)
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (7 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-10 19:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 20:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 22:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 20:13 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Kernel Version|2.6.31 |3.5.3
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (8 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-10 20:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 20:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-10 22:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 20:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #7 from Alan <alan@lxorguk.ukuu.org.uk> ---
No need - there is one obscure bug fix in early 2013, but nothing else since
2010. You may be the only person on the planet who still uses one!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread
* [Bug 15950] Hang in dc395x driver
2010-05-09 21:19 [Bug 15950] New: Hang in dc395x driver bugzilla-daemon
` (9 preceding siblings ...)
2013-12-10 20:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
@ 2013-12-10 22:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
10 siblings, 0 replies; 13+ messages in thread
From: bugzilla-daemon @ 2013-12-10 22:15 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: linux-scsi
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=15950
--- Comment #8 from ltskinol@gmail.com ---
Could be. Haven't found another inexpensive SCSI adapter.
I say the driver probably needs to get fixed or removed, though. No point in
having it in the kernel giving folks false hope that it'll work!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 13+ messages in thread