From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 188861] New: Function csio_config_device_caps() does not set error codes on failures
Date: Fri, 25 Nov 2016 11:04:27 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-188861-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=188861
Bug ID: 188861
Summary: Function csio_config_device_caps() does not set error
codes on failures
Product: SCSI Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: linux-4.9-rc6
Hardware: All
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P1
Component: Other
Assignee: scsi_drivers-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: bianpan2010@ruc.edu.cn
Regression: No
The function csio_config_device_caps() defined in file
drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_hw.c returns the value of variable rv at the end. By
reviewing the source code of the caller of csio_config_device_caps(), we can
infer that variable rv should takes a non-zero value on failures. However,
after the check of variable rv at line 1376, its value must be 0. As a result,
0 will be returned even if the subsequent calls to csio_mb_issue() (at line
1389) or csio_mb_fw_retval() (at line 1394) fails. I guess letting rv receives
the return value of csio_hw_validate_caps() at line 1375 may be a typo. Does
the author means "retval" instead of "rv"? Codes related to this bug are
summarised as follows.
csio_config_device_caps @@ drivers/scsi/csiostor/csio_hw.c
1347 static int
1348 csio_config_device_caps(struct csio_hw *hw)
1349 {
1350 struct csio_mb *mbp;
1351 enum fw_retval retval;
1352 int rv = -EINVAL;
1353
1354 mbp = mempool_alloc(hw->mb_mempool, GFP_ATOMIC);
1355 if (!mbp) {
1356 CSIO_INC_STATS(hw, n_err_nomem);
1357 return -ENOMEM;
1358 }
...
1374 /* Validate device capabilities */
1375 rv = csio_hw_validate_caps(hw, mbp); // use "retval" instead of "rv"?
1376 if (rv != 0)
1377 goto out;
1378
1379 /* Don't config device capabilities if already configured */
1380 if (hw->fw_state == CSIO_DEV_STATE_INIT) {
1381 rv = 0;
1382 goto out;
1383 }
1384
1385 /* Write back desired device capabilities */
1386 csio_mb_caps_config(hw, mbp, CSIO_MB_DEFAULT_TMO, true, true,
1387 false, true, NULL);
1388
1389 if (csio_mb_issue(hw, mbp)) {
1390 csio_err(hw, "Issue of FW_CAPS_CONFIG_CMD(w) failed!\n");
// on this error, the return value is 0
1391 goto out;
1392 }
1393
1394 retval = csio_mb_fw_retval(mbp);
1395 if (retval != FW_SUCCESS) {
1396 csio_err(hw, "FW_CAPS_CONFIG_CMD(w) returned %d!\n", retval);
// on this error, the return value is 0
1397 goto out;
1398 }
1399
1400 rv = 0;
1401 out:
1402 mempool_free(mbp, hw->mb_mempool);
1403 return rv;
1404 }
Thanks very much!
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.
reply other threads:[~2016-11-25 11:04 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-188861-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).