linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 212337] scsi_debug: race at module load and module unload
Date: Tue, 04 May 2021 21:18:22 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-212337-11613-HvylxRWG7p@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-212337-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>

https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212337

Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
             Status|RESOLVED                    |REOPENED
         Resolution|WILL_NOT_FIX                |---

--- Comment #13 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
(In reply to d gilbert from comment #12)
> On 2021-03-22 12:23 p.m., bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org wrote:
> > https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=212337
> > 
> > --- Comment #9 from Luis Chamberlain (mcgrof@kernel.org) ---
> > (In reply to d gilbert from comment #8)
> > 
> >>>> The scsi_debug module option that is already in place is:
> >>>>      tur_ms_to_ready: TEST UNIT READY millisecs before initial good
> status
> >>>> (def=0)
> >>
> >> You asked how it works, try:
> >>       modprobe scsi_debug tur_ms_to_ready=20000
> >>
> > 
> > That does not resolve the rmmod race against insmod:
> > 
> > scsi host2: scsi_debug: version 0190 [20200710]
> > [   42.213400]   dev_size_mb=8, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0
> > [   42.217527] scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access     Linux    scsi_debug      
> 0190
> > PQ: 0 ANSI: 7
> > [   42.223346] scsi 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> > [   42.282195] scsi host2: scsi_debug: version 0190 [20200710]
> > [   42.282195]   dev_size_mb=8, opts=0x0, submit_queues=1, statistics=0
> > [   42.288169] scsi 2:0:0:0: Direct-Access     Linux    scsi_debug      
> 0190
> > PQ: 0 ANSI: 7
> > [   42.292122] sd 2:0:0:0: Attached scsi generic sg0 type 0
> > [   42.292244] sd 2:0:0:0: Power-on or device reset occurred
> > [   42.302288] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Spinning up disk...
> > 
> > Then we wait...
> > 
> > [   44.308213] ...................ready
> > [   62.748919] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] 16384 512-byte logical blocks: (8.39
> MB/8.00
> > MiB)
> > [   62.754265] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Write Protect is off
> > [   62.763253] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Write cache: enabled, read cache: enabled,
> > supports DPO and FUA
> > [   62.776965] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Optimal transfer size 524288 bytes
> > [   62.883817] sd 2:0:0:0: [sda] Attached SCSI disk
> > 
> > And then rmmod still fails.
> > 
> 
> Just to explain a bit more about tur_ms_to_ready, that does not effect SCSI
> commands like REPORT LUNS, INQUIRY and REQUEST SENSE, but does slow down all
> "media access" commands including TEST UNIT READY (TUR) and READ CAPACITY. So
> if you watch what is happening with 'lsscsi -s' the device (LUN) will appear
> almost immediately but its size will be "-" due to the fact that READ
> CAPACITY (or TUR before it) is waiting for tur_ms_to_ready to elapse. After
> that the size (for disks) will be shown by 'lsscsi -s'.
> 
> 
> When you say 'rmmod still fails' do you mean it refuses to remove the module
> because the device is busy?

Yes. The refcnt must be 1 for rmmod to work. If it is not it will fail.

> If is busy, where is the race?. What precisely
> would you like to happen? What does a real SCSI HBA do?

That's the thing, the trace on comment #1 does not exactly show who to blame,
but there seems to be only two possibilities: systemd and multipath. Regardless
what is clearer is that once the device is exposed we *cannot* block userspace
from poking at the device. The best we can do, is udevadm settle, however that
still does not guarantee userspace things like multipath won't try to poke.

> Is there any way that a driver can detect that rmmod has been called and
> rejected?

Yes! try_module_get() would fail if rmmod was kicked off.

> If not, we could add  a "shutdown" writable attribute in
> /sys/bus/pseudo/drivers/scsi_debug/ . Then if a large number of pseudo
> devices is being built due to the modprobe invocation, the driver can go
> into reverse by checking that attribute before it adds another host
> (target or LUN?). After shutdown, the driver is still active, just with
> no hosts, and thus no LUNs. A more accurate name would be rm_all_hosts .

This may work actually, and so new users who would want to avoid this race
would have to issue this call prior to rmmod. That would remove the possibility
of a race. Let me know if you have a patch I can test. Putting this as
re-opened.

-- 
You may reply to this email to add a comment.

You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.

  parent reply	other threads:[~2021-05-04 21:18 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2021-03-18 17:09 [Bug 212337] New: scsi_debug: race at module load and module unload bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 17:38 ` [Bug 212337] " bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 18:32   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-03-18 17:43 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 18:42 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 19:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 21:00   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-03-18 19:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 19:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 19:57 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-18 21:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-22 16:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-23  0:37   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-03-22 18:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-22 18:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-03-23  0:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-04 21:18 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2021-05-05 15:57   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-05-04 21:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-05 16:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-07 18:25 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-07 20:46   ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-05-07 20:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-07 22:37 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-05-07 22:46 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-07-27 19:27 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-07-30 20:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2021-08-10  5:19 ` bugzilla-daemon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=bug-212337-11613-HvylxRWG7p@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
    --to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).