From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [23.128.96.18]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AEC61C433EF for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:02:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1351312AbiASECb (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:02:31 -0500 Received: from lindbergh.monkeyblade.net ([23.128.96.19]:44122 "EHLO lindbergh.monkeyblade.net" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1351133AbiASECa (ORCPT ); Tue, 18 Jan 2022 23:02:30 -0500 Received: from dfw.source.kernel.org (dfw.source.kernel.org [IPv6:2604:1380:4641:c500::1]) by lindbergh.monkeyblade.net (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 30420C061574 for ; Tue, 18 Jan 2022 20:02:30 -0800 (PST) Received: from smtp.kernel.org (relay.kernel.org [52.25.139.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by dfw.source.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id CCBC561581 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:02:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3B0B1C340E7 for ; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:02:29 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1642564949; bh=dESXpt713ZI9UgnaChumQl/wlRiUSIuteObq/9FDMsU=; h=From:To:Subject:Date:In-Reply-To:References:From; b=S2kyLfnO9VPE2jQEreQweaXTlpXxFbEbIO7N3y+HKRFm04yLPm+4i/ELHq5DBoubj lx/MF/HyIhCsNjjQEQvAm5QqYF0LEovc/nLaf2EyoppvGV5RpKIcMQatGoXxCOEoAG z+rQCIWhLu83Qhn1Y8c3BZxrf2EaZVjroF7mKQUhF7IJvJZAnqW+ID0x8XWdagi3Rw XLKcw531/D1ZyOUBHXdnJ3/Rdl7eiuK+uFPRCF7U6SBR1J5InmFl1v5pbxidEI+oNw 7e8GeLsrd6YerVoZP4yQMY4hs1s74XfXMUyZib/+4JrLTRP/yU94EV1C7Z0YVreC3T r1i93l4RPAGEw== Received: by aws-us-west-2-korg-bugzilla-1.web.codeaurora.org (Postfix, from userid 48) id 21526CC13B2; Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:02:29 +0000 (UTC) From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 215447] sr_mod scsi_mode_sense() failure -> "scsi-1 drive" Date: Wed, 19 Jan 2022 04:02:28 +0000 X-Bugzilla-Reason: None X-Bugzilla-Type: changed X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: AssignedTo scsi_drivers-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Product: SCSI Drivers X-Bugzilla-Component: Other X-Bugzilla-Version: 2.5 X-Bugzilla-Keywords: X-Bugzilla-Severity: normal X-Bugzilla-Who: martin.petersen@oracle.com X-Bugzilla-Status: NEW X-Bugzilla-Resolution: X-Bugzilla-Priority: P1 X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: scsi_drivers-other@kernel-bugs.osdl.org X-Bugzilla-Flags: X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: Message-ID: In-Reply-To: References: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugzilla.kernel.org/ Auto-Submitted: auto-generated MIME-Version: 1.0 Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=3D215447 --- Comment #8 from Martin K. Petersen (martin.petersen@oracle.com) --- > is it risky to implement the fallback mechanism in both directions? is > there a chance of forever retry? (fail 6, fail 10, fail 6, fail 10...) Just a heads-up that I am still working on a reasonable way to go about this. It is not entirely trivial to perform the transition from MODE SENSE(6) to (10) given how the SCSI disk driver works. --=20 You may reply to this email to add a comment. You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.=