From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 60758] module scsi_wait_scan not found kernel panic on boot
Date: Sat, 31 Aug 2013 20:50:22 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <bug-60758-11613-ryBlSpWcK3@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <bug-60758-11613@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/>
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=60758
--- Comment #11 from Jeff Zhou <jz.researcher@yahoo.com> ---
Thanks. I am a bit curious about the description in Kconfig,
since the scsi_wait_scan.ko was built from scsi_wait_scan.c, which was removed
in v.3.6.
How to refer a non-exist module, as described in the section of "config
SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC"
>From v.3.5.7 to v.3.6.1, there is a change in source code, but it seems the
documentation in Kconfig has not been updated.
(In reply to Alan Bartlett from comment #7)
> (In reply to Jeff Zhou from comment #5)
> > If your system fails by "module scsi_wait_scan not found", then it could be
> > the init script issue in your CentOS box.
> >
> > The last kernel with scsi_wait_scan.ko is v3.5.7, it has been removed ever
> > since v3.6. Any init script for 3.10 should not use that module.
> >
> >
> > Another point is in your config, the CONFIG_SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC is not set, try
> > to turn it into Y and see what's happening.
>
> Jeff,
>
> For the fuller picture please see --
>
> http://elrepo.org/bugs/view.php?id=401
>
> This non-booting issue only occurs with one system. The reporter has other
> systems which do boot correctly using the same kernel(s).
>
> As was explained in the referenced bug report (note 3235), the mention of
> "module scsi_wait_scan not found" is a red-herring.
>
> Note the following section from the 3.10.10 drivers/scsi/Kconfig file --
>
> [quote]
> config SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC
> bool "Asynchronous SCSI scanning"
> depends on SCSI
> help
> The SCSI subsystem can probe for devices while the rest of the
> system continues booting, and even probe devices on different
> busses in parallel, leading to a significant speed-up.
>
> If you have built SCSI as modules, enabling this option can
> be a problem as the devices may not have been found by the
> time your system expects them to have been. You can load the
> scsi_wait_scan module to ensure that all scans have completed.
> If you build your SCSI drivers into the kernel, then everything
> will work fine if you say Y here.
>
> You can override this choice by specifying "scsi_mod.scan=sync"
> or async on the kernel's command line.
> [/quote]
>
> It still makes a reference to the scsi_wait_scan module and advises against
> setting SCSI_SCAN_ASYNC=y when scsi drivers have been built as modules.
>
> It is unnecessary to build a new kernel to test, as per your last point.
> Just appending "scsi_mod.scan=async" to the kernel boot line will be
> sufficient.
>
> Perhaps the reporter will test with that and then report back?
>
> Alan / burakkucat.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2013-08-31 20:50 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 65+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2013-08-16 19:17 [Bug 60758] New: module scsi_wait_scan not found kernel panic on boot bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-16 19:18 ` [Bug 60758] " bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-16 23:32 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-29 5:13 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-30 7:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 3:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 4:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 16:02 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 16:49 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 17:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 17:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 20:50 ` bugzilla-daemon [this message]
2013-08-31 21:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 21:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 22:26 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-08-31 22:39 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01 0:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01 0:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-01 2:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 14:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 19:45 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-02 19:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 5:09 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 10:33 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 15:41 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-03 15:44 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04 4:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04 9:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-04 9:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 8:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 13:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 13:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 14:15 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 21:01 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 22:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-22 23:16 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-09-23 9:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-19 15:38 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-22 6:24 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 11:21 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 11:23 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-10-23 13:48 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-06 11:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-06 15:52 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-08 15:34 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-13 22:06 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-11-14 11:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-06 21:18 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-06 21:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-26 9:00 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-26 22:20 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-27 1:14 ` bugzilla-daemon
2013-12-31 6:22 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-01-22 21:17 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-01-29 10:19 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-07 15:54 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21 5:31 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21 5:35 ` bugzilla-daemon
2014-02-21 5:53 ` bugzilla-daemon
2015-10-08 2:55 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10 6:03 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10 6:51 ` bugzilla-daemon
2024-06-10 8:12 ` bugzilla-daemon
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=bug-60758-11613-ryBlSpWcK3@https.bugzilla.kernel.org/ \
--to=bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).