From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org
Subject: [Bug 78281] New: aacraid: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 255 bytes)
Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:23 +0000
Message-ID:
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Return-path:
Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:43018 "EHLO mail.kernel.org"
rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP
id S1752553AbaFRWx1 (ORCPT );
Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:53:27 -0400
Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B32E2038C
for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:26 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugzilla1.web.kernel.org (bugzilla1.web.kernel.org [172.20.200.51])
by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67DB20383
for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:23 +0000 (UTC)
Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org
List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78281
Bug ID: 78281
Summary: aacraid: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 255 bytes)
Product: SCSI Drivers
Version: 2.5
Kernel Version: 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.14.5-1~bpo70+1
(2014-06-05) x86_64 GNU/Linux
Hardware: x86-64
OS: Linux
Tree: Mainline
Status: NEW
Severity: high
Priority: P1
Component: AACRAID
Assignee: scsi_drivers-aacraid@kernel-bugs.osdl.org
Reporter: lee@yun.yagibdah.de
Regression: No
IBM x3650 7979 w/ ServeRaid 8k, updated to latest BIOS and firmware
Debian Wheezy with latest Debian kernel from Debian backports
running under xen-hypervisor
dom0 goes down with a stream of messages "aacraid 0000:04:00.0: swiotlb buffer
is full (sz: 255 bytes)"
The number of bytes varies.
04:00.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (Rocket) (rev 02)
Subsystem: IBM ServeRAID 8k/8k-l8
Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+
Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx-
Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR-
Kernel driver in use: aacraid
The 3.2 Debian kernel was not stable, either. I couldn't see the debugging
output, though.
I'll try 3.15.1 from kernel.org and see if there's any difference. Please let
me know what information you might need or if I can do something to get better
debugging info.
--
You are receiving this mail because:
You are watching the assignee of the bug.