From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: bugzilla-daemon@bugzilla.kernel.org Subject: [Bug 78281] New: aacraid: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 255 bytes) Date: Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:23 +0000 Message-ID: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from mail.kernel.org ([198.145.19.201]:43018 "EHLO mail.kernel.org" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1752553AbaFRWx1 (ORCPT ); Wed, 18 Jun 2014 18:53:27 -0400 Received: from mail.kernel.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9B32E2038C for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from bugzilla1.web.kernel.org (bugzilla1.web.kernel.org [172.20.200.51]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B67DB20383 for ; Wed, 18 Jun 2014 22:53:23 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org https://bugzilla.kernel.org/show_bug.cgi?id=78281 Bug ID: 78281 Summary: aacraid: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 255 bytes) Product: SCSI Drivers Version: 2.5 Kernel Version: 3.14-0.bpo.1-amd64 #1 SMP Debian 3.14.5-1~bpo70+1 (2014-06-05) x86_64 GNU/Linux Hardware: x86-64 OS: Linux Tree: Mainline Status: NEW Severity: high Priority: P1 Component: AACRAID Assignee: scsi_drivers-aacraid@kernel-bugs.osdl.org Reporter: lee@yun.yagibdah.de Regression: No IBM x3650 7979 w/ ServeRaid 8k, updated to latest BIOS and firmware Debian Wheezy with latest Debian kernel from Debian backports running under xen-hypervisor dom0 goes down with a stream of messages "aacraid 0000:04:00.0: swiotlb buffer is full (sz: 255 bytes)" The number of bytes varies. 04:00.0 RAID bus controller: Adaptec AAC-RAID (Rocket) (rev 02) Subsystem: IBM ServeRAID 8k/8k-l8 Control: I/O+ Mem+ BusMaster+ SpecCycle- MemWINV- VGASnoop- ParErr+ Stepping- SERR+ FastB2B- DisINTx- Status: Cap+ 66MHz- UDF- FastB2B- ParErr- DEVSEL=fast >TAbort- SERR- Kernel driver in use: aacraid The 3.2 Debian kernel was not stable, either. I couldn't see the debugging output, though. I'll try 3.15.1 from kernel.org and see if there's any difference. Please let me know what information you might need or if I can do something to get better debugging info. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are watching the assignee of the bug.