From: Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com>
To: "Alex Bennée" <alex.bennee@linaro.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org, maxim.uvarov@linaro.org,
joakim.bech@linaro.org, ulf.hansson@linaro.org,
ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org, arnd@linaro.org,
ruchika.gupta@linaro.org, tomas.winkler@intel.com,
yang.huang@intel.com, bing.zhu@intel.com,
Matti.Moell@opensynergy.com, hmo@opensynergy.com,
linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
bvanassche@acm.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] rpmb subsystem, uapi and virtio-rpmb driver
Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2022 19:19:24 +0200 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c18a2b359046a14250cafa5a619dbe53f2872b5a.camel@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <87ee2ajuky.fsf@linaro.org>
On Wed, 2022-04-06 at 12:22 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
>
> Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> writes:
>
> > On Tue, 2022-04-05 at 16:43 +0100, Alex Bennée wrote:
> > >
> > > Bean Huo <huobean@gmail.com> writes:
> > >
> > > > Hi Alex,
> > > >
> > > > Thanks for this unified RPMB interface, I wanted to verify this
> > > > on
> > > > our
> > > > UFS, it seems you didn't add the UFS access interface in this
> > > > version
> > > > from your userspace tools, right?
> > >
> > > No I didn't but it should be easy enough to add some function
> > > pointer
> > > redirection everywhere one of the op_* functions calls a vrpmb_*
> > > function. Do you already have a UFS RPMB device driver?
> > >
> >
> > Hi Alex,
> > Thanks for your feedback.
> >
> > We now access UFS RPMB through the RPMB LUN BSG device, RPMB is a
> > well-
> > known LU and we have a userspace tool to access it.
> >
> > I see that if we're going to use your interface, "static struct
> > rpmb_ops" should be registered from a lower-level driver, for
> > example
> > in a UFS driver, yes there should be no problem with this
> > registration,
> > but I don't know with the current way Compared, what are the
> > advantages
> > to add a driver. maybe the main advantage is that we will have an
> > unified user space tool for RPMB. right?
>
> Pretty much. The main issue for virtio-rpmb is it doesn't really fit
> neatly into the block stack because all it does is the RPMB part so a
> non-block orientate API makes sense.
>
> Can you point be to where the UFS driver does it's current RPMB
> stuff?
>
It's the SCSI BSG driver, in fact, we don't have a dedicated UFS RPMB
driver in the kernel. RPMB is a well known LU, we are using userspace
tools to issue SCSI commands directly to the UFS RPMB LU via ioctl()
from the BSG device node in the /dev/sg/ folder.
Here is the BSG part of the code in the userspace tools:
io_hdr_v4.guard = 'Q';
io_hdr_v4.protocol = BSG_PROTOCOL_SCSI;
io_hdr_v4.subprotocol = BSG_SUB_PROTOCOL_SCSI_CMD;
io_hdr_v4.response = (__u64)sense_buffer;
io_hdr_v4.max_response_len = SENSE_BUFF_LEN;
io_hdr_v4.request_len = cmd_len;
io_hdr_v4.request = (__u64)cdb;
ioctl(fd, SG_IO, &io_hdr_v4))
...
> >
> > Kind regards,
> > Bean
>
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-04-06 19:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 29+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-04-05 9:37 [PATCH v2 0/4] rpmb subsystem, uapi and virtio-rpmb driver Alex Bennée
2022-04-05 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 1/4] rpmb: add Replay Protected Memory Block (RPMB) subsystem Alex Bennée
2022-04-05 21:59 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-06 11:21 ` Alex Bennée
2022-04-05 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 2/4] char: rpmb: provide a user space interface Alex Bennée
2022-06-16 15:09 ` Harald Mommer
2022-06-16 19:21 ` Arnd Bergmann
2022-04-05 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 3/4] rpmb: create virtio rpmb frontend driver Alex Bennée
2022-06-16 15:44 ` Harald Mommer
2022-04-05 9:37 ` [PATCH v2 4/4] tools rpmb: add RPBM access tool Alex Bennée
2022-06-16 13:13 ` Harald Mommer
2022-04-05 14:54 ` [PATCH v2 0/4] rpmb subsystem, uapi and virtio-rpmb driver Bean Huo
2022-04-05 15:43 ` Alex Bennée
2022-04-05 17:03 ` Bean Huo
2022-04-06 11:22 ` Alex Bennée
2022-04-06 17:19 ` Bean Huo [this message]
2022-04-06 17:32 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-06 18:12 ` Bean Huo
2022-04-06 20:20 ` Bart Van Assche
2022-04-07 16:28 ` Bean Huo
2022-04-06 17:27 ` Bean Huo
2022-04-22 14:21 ` Alex Bennée
[not found] ` <20230531191007.13460-1-shyamsaini@linux.microsoft.com>
2023-06-01 1:02 ` Zhu, Bing
2023-06-01 5:31 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-06-01 5:48 ` Sumit Garg
2023-06-02 8:25 ` Ilias Apalodimas
2023-06-12 17:06 ` Jens Wiklander
2023-06-13 0:49 ` Shyam Saini
2023-06-13 16:47 ` Shyam Saini
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c18a2b359046a14250cafa5a619dbe53f2872b5a.camel@gmail.com \
--to=huobean@gmail.com \
--cc=Matti.Moell@opensynergy.com \
--cc=alex.bennee@linaro.org \
--cc=arnd@linaro.org \
--cc=bing.zhu@intel.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=hmo@opensynergy.com \
--cc=ilias.apalodimas@linaro.org \
--cc=joakim.bech@linaro.org \
--cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-mmc@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=maxim.uvarov@linaro.org \
--cc=ruchika.gupta@linaro.org \
--cc=tomas.winkler@intel.com \
--cc=ulf.hansson@linaro.org \
--cc=yang.huang@intel.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).