From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: denebeim@deepthot.org (Jay Denebeim) Subject: Re: coding style question Date: Wed, 25 Feb 2004 19:37:49 +0000 (UTC) Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Message-ID: References: <20040225182523.GD25779@parcelfarce.linux.theplanet.co.uk> <20040225112905.33bfdea8.rddunlap@osdl.org> Return-path: Received: from deepthot.org ([68.14.232.127]:48293 "EHLO dent.deepthot.org") by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S261275AbUBYThv (ORCPT ); Wed, 25 Feb 2004 14:37:51 -0500 Received: from news by dent.deepthot.org with local (Exim 4.30) id 1Aw4qr-0002FZ-FZ for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Wed, 25 Feb 2004 12:37:49 -0700 List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org In article <20040225112905.33bfdea8.rddunlap@osdl.org>, Randy.Dunlap wrote: >For anything other than very basic types, they hide/obfuscate data >structures. If it's a struct, we had rather see a struct used there. Okay, that's more or less what I figured it was, thanks. Personally I never found that it did that for me, the 'struct' always seemed redundant. That's just my opinion though, and I can certainly understand others. Thanks for the answer. Jay -- * Jay Denebeim Moderator rec.arts.sf.tv.babylon5.moderated * * newsgroup submission address: b5mod@deepthot.org * * moderator contact address: b5mod-request@deepthot.org * * personal contact address: denebeim@deepthot.org *