From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from bali.collaboradmins.com (bali.collaboradmins.com [148.251.105.195]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 80EB33A89A7; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 09:43:33 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768902215; cv=none; b=UqeEAMpBN11MsrP7bMwN7MtA4Wsje3y9uodxwRnBQyS+kwjLKtnohQLuqcXpsetX07j5Ir8I/uuLmN9oxBpDYPLwCq8N6K6DXZPUI+n2vMY4/k2JS0m0Ujh2GsurBAjrkD0+g4jGCU1M3qR6NqT3u2MKjwrse9A8T93WZTe8Cek= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1768902215; c=relaxed/simple; bh=cFmtw+W0nIPjyA9JXnCJ34TLkLN51eHKUkL0cw7+gFs=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=VgHRgvIImaR9lwW2OuuOuq8Pyat6x/eIQiWV+sY5+DJnTT6kIGFSY+u97SMlSsp1hYe7x4Bcid9TDIOxVoZSRFl1fqLCKcz5oVqQDN5jsKBjckQMdMcqqMqBpdOE9o7yjs6i98B7cWfxnATDcCtwigjvKlEyZxDEC+SfF2fESzo= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b=aJf6ki/5; arc=none smtp.client-ip=148.251.105.195 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dmarc=pass (p=none dis=none) header.from=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=collabora.com Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=collabora.com header.i=@collabora.com header.b="aJf6ki/5" DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=collabora.com; s=mail; t=1768902211; bh=cFmtw+W0nIPjyA9JXnCJ34TLkLN51eHKUkL0cw7+gFs=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=aJf6ki/55o9knlTHmfUazfZ+yXtr8Aw7sNER1HrKmXGGtA57yT7kPoc1Sn+kz30iz mGJoCamBbqY+HYJ0ltn/pgn6zRhCaK2nMrMgqGG4rI30O0xzbtrzPZJpYZnW2sJ/Zy nC/6gjaBFSUnc0pSjDic7VxOFBXmGZYFT/BaVDriwRu9OdtUlgkG9Qn8drbBqxAfw9 KCsNLvo4KRWqXSHqZLQtfEeGt17ta1ZWgR6NXHLjKD5S2zU2hkCwKNvyaWzHc7JtWb cFeBc6eKGSBkjd6wpWnPgYGxX2myF//YDwVD4YbO7f1KMXiWJjwR95tsP8ujPxB7Fb x1A9PUrSKfZ4w== Received: from [192.168.1.100] (2-237-20-237.ip236.fastwebnet.it [2.237.20.237]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 (128/128 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) (Authenticated sender: kholk11) by bali.collaboradmins.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 49F3F17E0CF3; Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:43:30 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2026 10:43:29 +0100 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 11/24] scsi: ufs: mediatek: Rework probe function To: =?UTF-8?B?UGV0ZXIgV2FuZyAo546L5L+h5Y+LKQ==?= , "chu.stanley@gmail.com" , "robh@kernel.org" , =?UTF-8?B?Q2h1bmZlbmcgWXVuICjkupHmmKXls7Ap?= , "kishon@kernel.org" , "James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com" , "bvanassche@acm.org" , =?UTF-8?B?Q2hhb3RpYW4gSmluZyAo5LqV5pyd5aSpKQ==?= , "conor+dt@kernel.org" , "lgirdwood@gmail.com" , "nicolas.frattaroli@collabora.com" , "vkoul@kernel.org" , "krzk+dt@kernel.org" , "p.zabel@pengutronix.de" , "alim.akhtar@samsung.com" , "krzk@kernel.org" , "neil.armstrong@linaro.org" , "matthias.bgg@gmail.com" , "avri.altman@wdc.com" , "broonie@kernel.org" , "martin.petersen@oracle.com" Cc: "linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" , "devicetree@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org" , "linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-phy@lists.infradead.org" , "linux-mediatek@lists.infradead.org" , Louis-Alexis Eyraud , "kernel@collabora.com" References: <20260108-mt8196-ufs-v5-0-49215157ec41@collabora.com> <20260108-mt8196-ufs-v5-11-49215157ec41@collabora.com> <81ed17eb-2170-4e97-b56d-488b5335ff5c@kernel.org> <87887adf-2c94-48c2-8f83-4e772ab50f60@kernel.org> <66ca211a-c909-4d0c-a22c-9cbd3489d372@kernel.org> <46cb450f92887ceba07614dc85ed495f6af7f602.camel@mediatek.com> <26c68bb1-1e63-4b47-babc-21ae27e3205e@collabora.com> <74944c55418976375955430d27ac568149d555f1.camel@mediatek.com> From: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno Content-Language: en-US In-Reply-To: <74944c55418976375955430d27ac568149d555f1.camel@mediatek.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Il 13/01/26 08:26, Peter Wang (王信友) ha scritto: > On Mon, 2026-01-12 at 16:02 +0100, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote: >> No, MediaTek's reset hardware implementation is not the same as Texas >> Instruments. >> It was *very similar* to TI in the past (years ago, around the MT6795 >> Helio >> generation times). >> >> MediaTek's reset controller - by hardware - is definitely different >> from the one >> found in TI SoCs. >> >> Regards, >> Angelo > > I did not notice this change. > Will you be helping to upstream MediaTek's reset controller instead of > TI's? > The main reset controllers are already integrated in clock drivers since ... well, years ago. If there's any additional reset controller that is missing, and special to UFS, and that's not in the UFS clock driver, yes we can upstream that. Cheers, Angelo > Thanks > Peter >