From: Chaitra Basappa <chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
To: Sathya Prakash Veerichetty <sathya.prakash@broadcom.com>,
emilne@redhat.com, Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@stratus.com>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
Suganath Prabu Subramani <suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com>,
Calvin Owens <calvinowens@fb.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mpt3sas - remove unused fw_event_work delayed_work
Date: Mon, 11 Apr 2016 16:43:33 +0530 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c762138f15c771759b451b16d97f199e@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <38b26e94d10098596fb11cf9bafcb7c0@mail.gmail.com>
Hi,
Please consider this patch as Ack-by: Chaitra P B
<chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com>
Thanks,
Chaitra
-----Original Message-----
From: Sathya Prakash [mailto:sathya.prakash@broadcom.com]
Sent: Saturday, April 02, 2016 1:45 AM
To: emilne@redhat.com; Joe Lawrence
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Chaitra Basappa; Suganath Prabu Subramani;
Calvin Owens
Subject: RE: [PATCH] mpt3sas - remove unused fw_event_work delayed_work
We will look into this early next week and provide a detailed response. On
the first look this is ACK from Broadcom, will reconfirm.
-----Original Message-----
From: Ewan D. Milne [mailto:emilne@redhat.com]
Sent: Friday, April 01, 2016 2:04 PM
To: Joe Lawrence
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org; Sathya Prakash; Chaitra P B; Suganath Prabu
Subramani; Calvin Owens
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mpt3sas - remove unused fw_event_work delayed_work
On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 15:13 -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> On 04/01/2016 02:51 PM, Ewan D. Milne wrote:
> > On Fri, 2016-04-01 at 13:56 -0400, Joe Lawrence wrote:
> >> @@ -2804,12 +2803,12 @@ _scsih_fw_event_cleanup_queue(struct
> >> MPT3SAS_ADAPTER *ioc)
> >> /*
> >> * Wait on the fw_event to complete. If this returns 1, then
> >> * the event was never executed, and we need a put for the
> >> - * reference the delayed_work had on the fw_event.
> >> + * reference the work had on the fw_event.
> >> *
> >> * If it did execute, we wait for it to finish, and the put will
> >> * happen from _firmware_event_work()
> >> */
> >> - if (cancel_delayed_work_sync(&fw_event->delayed_work))
> >> + if (cancel_work_sync(&fw_event->work))
> >> fw_event_work_put(fw_event);
> >>
> >> fw_event_work_put(fw_event);
> >
> > Hmm... Fixes: 146b16c8 (mpt3sas: Refcount fw_events and fix unsafe
> > list usage)
>
> This could technically go back to f92363d12359 (mpt3sas: add new
> driver supporting 12GB SAS) ... but will probably only apply cleanly
> to _scsih_fw_event_cleanup_queue after 146b16c8 (mpt3sas: Refcount
> fw_events and fix unsafe list usage), so you're right.
>
> > Since mpt3sas uses ->work instead of _delayed_work this would seem
> > to be correct, however the deprecated mpt2sas driver had a commit
> > that changed the firmware event work mechanism to use ->delayed_work
> > instead of ->work:
> >
> > commit f1c35e6aea579d5bdb6dc02dfa99c67c7c3b3f67
> > Author: Kashyap, Desai <kashyap.desai@lsi.com>
> > Date: Tue Mar 9 16:31:43 2010 +0530
>
> Okay, so this is pre-mpt3sas split.
>
> > [SCSI] mpt2sas: RESCAN Barrier work is added in case of HBA reset.
> >
> > Add the cancel_pending_work flag from the fw_event_work
> > structure, and then to
> > set the flag during host reset, check the flag later from work
> > threads
> > context and if cancel_pending_work_flag is set ingore those events.
>
> More unused mpt2 vestiges in the mpt3 version?
>
> % cd drivers/scsi/mpt3sas/
> % grep 'cancel_pending_work' *.{c,h}
> mpt3sas_scsih.c: * @cancel_pending_work: flag set during reset handling
> mpt3sas_scsih.c: u8 cancel_pending_work;
>
> > Now Rescan after host reset is changed.
> > Added special task MPT2SAS_RESCAN_AFTER_HOST_RESET. This task
> > will be queued
> > at the time of HBA reset. this task is treated as barrier. All
> > work after
> > MPT2SAS_RESCAN_AFTER_HOST_RESET will be treated as new work and
> > will be
> > server by callback handle. If host_recovery is going on while
> > running RESCAN
> > task, it will wait for shos_recovery_done completion which will
> > be called
> > from HBA reset DONE context.
>
> FWIW, I don't see anything like this in today's mpt3sas driver.
Well, that's the question. Is there some functionality missing? Were the
changes abandoned/replaced? mpt2sas used delayed_work for something else,
so maybe that's why the firmware event changes initially used it (albeit
with a 0 delay) but it's hard to know...
cancel_delayed_work() will call del_timer() on delayed_work->timer, but it
looks like kzalloc is used to allocate the fw_event_work objects so perhaps
nothing bad will happen. I was wondering, though, because I have seen dumps
of hung systems with requests that should have timed out but are not on any
timer list.
-Ewan
>
> Regards,
>
> -- Joe
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2016-04-11 11:13 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2016-04-01 17:56 [PATCH] mpt3sas - remove unused fw_event_work delayed_work Joe Lawrence
2016-04-01 18:04 ` Laurence Oberman
2016-04-01 18:51 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-04-01 19:13 ` Joe Lawrence
2016-04-01 20:04 ` Ewan D. Milne
2016-04-01 20:14 ` Sathya Prakash
2016-04-11 11:13 ` Chaitra Basappa [this message]
2016-04-11 12:08 ` Joe Lawrence
2016-04-15 2:43 ` Martin K. Petersen
2016-04-15 9:57 ` Chaitra Basappa
2016-04-15 17:26 ` Sathya Prakash Veerichetty
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c762138f15c771759b451b16d97f199e@mail.gmail.com \
--to=chaitra.basappa@broadcom.com \
--cc=calvinowens@fb.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=joe.lawrence@stratus.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=sathya.prakash@broadcom.com \
--cc=suganath-prabu.subramani@broadcom.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).