From: Chaitanya Kulkarni <chaitanyak@nvidia.com>
To: Keith Busch <kbusch@kernel.org>
Cc: "linux-block@vger.kernel.org" <linux-block@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-raid@vger.kernel.org" <linux-raid@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org" <linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org>,
"linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org>,
"target-devel@vger.kernel.org" <target-devel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org" <linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org>,
"linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org" <linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org>,
"dm-devel@redhat.com" <dm-devel@redhat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 3/8] nvme: add support for the Verify command
Date: Thu, 11 Nov 2021 08:09:07 +0000 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8283a02-32df-5268-7526-7f1dbf2a15b2@nvidia.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20211104224459.GB2655721@dhcp-10-100-145-180.wdc.com>
On 11/4/2021 3:44 PM, Keith Busch wrote:
> External email: Use caution opening links or attachments
>
>
> On Wed, Nov 03, 2021 at 11:46:29PM -0700, Chaitanya Kulkarni wrote:
>> +static inline blk_status_t nvme_setup_verify(struct nvme_ns *ns,
>> + struct request *req, struct nvme_command *cmnd)
>> +{
>
> Due to recent driver changes, you need a "memset(cmnd, 0, sizeof(*cmnd))"
> prior to setting up the rest of the command, or you need to set each
> command dword individually.
Agree, will fix that in V1.
>
>> + cmnd->verify.opcode = nvme_cmd_verify;
>> + cmnd->verify.nsid = cpu_to_le32(ns->head->ns_id);
>> + cmnd->verify.slba =
>> + cpu_to_le64(nvme_sect_to_lba(ns, blk_rq_pos(req)));
>> + cmnd->verify.length =
>> + cpu_to_le16((blk_rq_bytes(req) >> ns->lba_shift) - 1);
>> + cmnd->verify.control = 0;
>> + return BLK_STS_OK;
>> +}
>
>> +static void nvme_config_verify(struct gendisk *disk, struct nvme_ns *ns)
>> +{
>> + u64 max_blocks;
>> +
>> + if (!(ns->ctrl->oncs & NVME_CTRL_ONCS_VERIFY))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + if (ns->ctrl->max_hw_sectors == UINT_MAX)
>> + max_blocks = (u64)USHRT_MAX + 1;
>> + else
>> + max_blocks = ns->ctrl->max_hw_sectors + 1;
>
> If supported by the controller, this maximum is defined in the non-mdts
> command limits in NVM command set specific Identify Controller VSL field.
>
I need take a closer look at this. I'll fix that in V1.
>> +
>> + /* keep same as discard */
>> + if (blk_queue_flag_test_and_set(QUEUE_FLAG_VERIFY, disk->queue))
>> + return;
>> +
>> + blk_queue_max_verify_sectors(disk->queue,
>> + nvme_lba_to_sect(ns, max_blocks));
>> +
>> +}
Thanks for the comment Keith.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-11-11 8:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 26+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-11-04 6:46 [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 1/8] " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 17:25 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-11 8:01 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 2/8] scsi: add REQ_OP_VERIFY support Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 12:33 ` Damien Le Moal
2021-11-11 8:07 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 3/8] nvme: add support for the Verify command Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 22:44 ` Keith Busch
2021-11-11 8:09 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni [this message]
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [PATCH 4/8] nvmet: add Verify command support for bdev-ns Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 5/8] nvmet: add Verify emulation " Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 6/8] nvmet: add verify emulation support for file-ns Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 7/8] null_blk: add REQ_OP_VERIFY support Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 6:46 ` [RFC PATCH 8/8] md: add support for REQ_OP_VERIFY Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-11 8:13 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-12 15:19 ` Mike Snitzer
2021-11-04 7:14 ` [RFC PATCH 0/8] block: " Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 9:27 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 17:32 ` Darrick J. Wong
2021-11-04 17:34 ` Christoph Hellwig
2021-11-04 22:37 ` Keith Busch
2021-11-05 8:25 ` javier
2021-11-11 8:18 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
2021-11-04 15:16 ` Douglas Gilbert
2021-11-11 8:27 ` Chaitanya Kulkarni
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8283a02-32df-5268-7526-7f1dbf2a15b2@nvidia.com \
--to=chaitanyak@nvidia.com \
--cc=dm-devel@redhat.com \
--cc=kbusch@kernel.org \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-fsdevel@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-raid@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-xfs@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=target-devel@vger.kernel.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox