From: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
To: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com>,
Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>, Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>,
Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>,
Asutosh Das <asutoshd@codeaurora.org>,
Vignesh Raghavendra <vigneshr@ti.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>,
Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ufs: Increase the usable queue depth
Date: Fri, 14 May 2021 12:04:43 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <c8932f54e6e95797c2969a16d07fd926@codeaurora.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20210513164912.5683-1-bvanassche@acm.org>
Hi Bart,
On 2021-05-14 00:49, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> With the current implementation of the UFS driver active_queues is 1
> instead of 0 if all UFS request queues are idle. That causes
> hctx_may_queue() to divide the queue depth by 2 when queueing a request
> and hence reduces the usable queue depth.
This is interesting. When all UFS queues are idle, in hctx_may_queue(),
active_queues reads 1 (users == 1, depth == 32), where is it divided by
2?
static inline bool hctx_may_queue(struct blk_mq_hw_ctx *hctx,
struct sbitmap_queue *bt)
{
unsigned int depth, users;
....
users = atomic_read(&hctx->tags->active_queues);
}
if (!users)
return true;
/*
* Allow at least some tags
*/
depth = max((bt->sb.depth + users - 1) / users, 4U);
return __blk_mq_active_requests(hctx) < depth;
}
Thanks,
Can Guo.
>
> The shared tag set code in the block layer keeps track of the number of
> active request queues. blk_mq_tag_busy() is called before a request is
> queued onto a hwq and blk_mq_tag_idle() is called some time after the
> hwq
> became idle. blk_mq_tag_idle() is called from inside
> blk_mq_timeout_work().
> Hence, blk_mq_tag_idle() is only called if a timer is associated with
> each
> request that is submitted to a request queue that shares a tag set with
> another request queue. Hence this patch that adds a
> blk_mq_start_request()
> call in ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(). This patch doubles the queue depth on my
> test setup from 16 to 32.
>
> In addition to increasing the usable queue depth, also fix the
> documentation of the 'timeout' parameter in the header above
> ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd().
>
> Cc: Can Guo <cang@codeaurora.org>
> Cc: Alim Akhtar <alim.akhtar@samsung.com>
> Cc: Avri Altman <avri.altman@wdc.com>
> Cc: Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@mediatek.com>
> Cc: Bean Huo <beanhuo@micron.com>
> Cc: Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@intel.com>
> Fixes: 7252a3603015 ("scsi: ufs: Avoid busy-waiting by eliminating tag
> conflicts")
> Signed-off-by: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
> ---
> drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 ++++-
> 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> index c96e36aab989..e669243354da 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
> @@ -2838,7 +2838,7 @@ static int ufshcd_wait_for_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba
> *hba,
> * ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd - API for sending device management requests
> * @hba: UFS hba
> * @cmd_type: specifies the type (NOP, Query...)
> - * @timeout: time in seconds
> + * @timeout: timeout in milliseconds
> *
> * NOTE: Since there is only one available tag for device management
> commands,
> * it is expected you hold the hba->dev_cmd.lock mutex.
> @@ -2868,6 +2868,9 @@ static int ufshcd_exec_dev_cmd(struct ufs_hba
> *hba,
> }
> tag = req->tag;
> WARN_ON_ONCE(!ufshcd_valid_tag(hba, tag));
> + /* Set the timeout such that the SCSI error handler is not activated.
> */
> + req->timeout = msecs_to_jiffies(2 * timeout);
> + blk_mq_start_request(req);
>
> init_completion(&wait);
> lrbp = &hba->lrb[tag];
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2021-05-14 4:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 8+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2021-05-13 16:49 [PATCH] ufs: Increase the usable queue depth Bart Van Assche
2021-05-14 4:04 ` Can Guo [this message]
2021-05-14 4:19 ` Bart Van Assche
2021-05-14 4:24 ` Can Guo
2021-05-14 4:47 ` Can Guo
2021-05-14 4:22 ` Can Guo
2021-05-15 3:13 ` Martin K. Petersen
2021-06-29 13:40 ` Can Guo
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=c8932f54e6e95797c2969a16d07fd926@codeaurora.org \
--to=cang@codeaurora.org \
--cc=adrian.hunter@intel.com \
--cc=alim.akhtar@samsung.com \
--cc=asutoshd@codeaurora.org \
--cc=avri.altman@wdc.com \
--cc=beanhuo@micron.com \
--cc=bvanassche@acm.org \
--cc=jaegeuk@kernel.org \
--cc=jejb@linux.vnet.ibm.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=stanley.chu@mediatek.com \
--cc=vigneshr@ti.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).