From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.2 required=3.0 tests=HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS, MAILING_LIST_MULTI,MENTIONS_GIT_HOSTING,SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS, USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A3F60C432C3 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:00:34 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vger.kernel.org (vger.kernel.org [209.132.180.67]) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6FF88206D5 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 17:00:33 +0000 (UTC) Received: (majordomo@vger.kernel.org) by vger.kernel.org via listexpand id S1727254AbfKMRAe (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:00:34 -0500 Received: from mail-pl1-f194.google.com ([209.85.214.194]:38056 "EHLO mail-pl1-f194.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1726195AbfKMRAd (ORCPT ); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 12:00:33 -0500 Received: by mail-pl1-f194.google.com with SMTP id w8so1315766plq.5 for ; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:00:33 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=EZH97raVR/wdf3EG+owV45UFlV+fCbiJx83DUHjnv8Q=; b=FZQuSBoM7jgi7Cf4Irzkyx5zhVgarnVceUeO9Jkaly7FTD6HhYx00UMVdhifW9MgNu EGD+SRfa5MhXd1psy6b2ObC5lyEhNOmkeqC9dxF5JwcGRUN7vdnBf/1oWImVxGqHc9UR KyfT8iXZyHNK1cm0rdH8KzZMaQrP6Z9ng2gite3O2/ljw9NsTyy98xQyAhuE+JiRm4CK 1oGWdhKY0f210A7pEfzvwOcd+e1+0p02DbACDnP2ja/Hy3HPQsQzBfM5Rs66Cat2gwlh YRLrsbkvN3PTnqtwptJFRQ7TbVuJwRRomKhFMZJLFLaSYGmSH9IVPRPXJHKVRqHHTivx 6toQ== X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVGO0I1oWR/yAdI2IxPwFmz4pIP50K1ugRag5vX1tkQVzwj/6AU hOGNu6KXgWVPFN42AukNBqg= X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqywNuxy7VF/s1Ad1WkxD3amYw7Ncm698C3x712K40GS3AtDQK5q7mF67P2zJBP+ODZMTNv43g== X-Received: by 2002:a17:902:d891:: with SMTP id b17mr4883263plz.256.1573664432887; Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:00:32 -0800 (PST) Received: from desktop-bart.svl.corp.google.com ([2620:15c:2cd:202:4308:52a3:24b6:2c60]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id c16sm3332224pfo.34.2019.11.13.09.00.30 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:00:31 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: [scsi] 74eb6c22dc: suspend_stress.fail To: Ming Lei Cc: kernel test robot , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, "Martin K . Petersen" , James Bottomley , Jens Axboe , "Ewan D . Milne" , Omar Sandoval , Christoph Hellwig , Kashyap Desai , Hannes Reinecke , Laurence Oberman , Bart Van Assche , lkp@lists.01.org References: <20191104085021.GF13369@xsang-OptiPlex-9020> <824c5a0b-a31a-b0a2-b14a-ab6edd294d07@acm.org> <20191105061150.GA17084@ming.t460p> From: Bart Van Assche Message-ID: Date: Wed, 13 Nov 2019 09:00:29 -0800 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.9.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20191105061150.GA17084@ming.t460p> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org Precedence: bulk List-ID: X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org On 11/4/19 10:11 PM, Ming Lei wrote: > On Mon, Nov 04, 2019 at 07:52:59PM -0800, Bart Van Assche wrote: >> On 2019-11-04 00:50, kernel test robot wrote: >>> FYI, we noticed the following commit (built with gcc-7): >>> >>> commit: 74eb6c22dc70e395b333c9ca579855cd88db8845 ("[RFC PATCH V3 2/2] scsi: core: don't limit per-LUN queue depth for SSD") >>> url: https://github.com/0day-ci/linux/commits/Ming-Lei/scsi-core-avoid-host-wide-host_busy-counter-for-scsi_mq/20191009-015827 >>> base: https://git.kernel.org/cgit/linux/kernel/git/jejb/scsi.git for-next >>> >>> in testcase: suspend_stress >>> with following parameters: >>> >>> mode: freeze >>> iterations: 10 >> >> Hi Ming, >> >> This is the second report by the build robot that this patch causes the >> suspend_stress test to fail. I assume that that means that that test >> failure is not a coincidence. The previous report (Oct-22) is available >> at https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20191023003027.GD12647@shao2-debian/. > > Yeah, it should be one real issue, and there are other issues too. I will work > out a new version for addressing all. Hi Ming, Have you already made any progress? I'm asking because the v5.5 merge window is expected to open soon (this weekend). Thanks, Bart.