public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
To: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>,
	"lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org"
	<lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org>
Cc: linux-block@vger.kernel.org, Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
	Sagi Grimberg <sagi@grimberg.me>,
	linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Keith Busch <keith.busch@intel.com>
Subject: Re: [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers
Date: Wed, 11 Jan 2017 08:07:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cc00cc1f-17d7-105e-ef2c-61791b7cc676@kernel.dk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20170111134312.GH6286@linux-x5ow.site>

On 01/11/2017 06:43 AM, Johannes Thumshirn wrote:
> Hi all,
> 
> I'd like to attend LSF/MM and would like to discuss polling for block drivers.
> 
> Currently there is blk-iopoll but it is neither as widely used as NAPI in the
> networking field and accoring to Sagi's findings in [1] performance with
> polling is not on par with IRQ usage.
> 
> On LSF/MM I'd like to whether it is desirable to have NAPI like polling in
> more block drivers and how to overcome the currently seen performance issues.

It would be an interesting topic to discuss, as it is a shame that blk-iopoll
isn't used more widely.

-- 
Jens Axboe


  parent reply	other threads:[~2017-01-11 15:07 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 49+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2017-01-11 13:43 [LSF/MM TOPIC][LSF/MM ATTEND] NAPI polling for block drivers Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 13:46 ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 15:07 ` Jens Axboe [this message]
2017-01-11 15:13   ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12  8:23     ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 10:02       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 11:44         ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 12:53           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12 14:41             ` [Lsf-pc] " Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 18:59               ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 15:38       ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 15:45         ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-20 12:22           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:15         ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-17 16:27           ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-17 16:38             ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 13:51               ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 14:27                 ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:36                   ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:40                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:35                       ` Andrey Kuzmin
2017-01-18 14:58                   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:14                     ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 15:16                       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-18 15:39                         ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-19  8:12                           ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19  8:23                             ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-19  9:18                               ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-19  9:13                             ` Johannes Thumshirn
     [not found]         ` <CANvN+emx1-F3iAY45t1_MQRcijw7sf1jPvjwv0uh8A3GzzQwMg@mail.gmail.com>
2017-01-17 16:50           ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-18 14:02             ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-20  0:13               ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-13 15:56     ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-11 15:16   ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12  4:36   ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-12  4:44     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-12  4:56       ` Stephen Bates
2017-01-19 10:57   ` Ming Lei
2017-01-19 11:03     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:08 ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:12   ` hch
2017-01-11 16:15     ` Jens Axboe
2017-01-11 16:22     ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-11 16:26       ` Bart Van Assche
2017-01-11 16:45         ` Hannes Reinecke
2017-01-12  8:52         ` sagi grimberg
2017-01-11 16:14   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2017-01-12  8:41   ` Sagi Grimberg
2017-01-12 19:13     ` Bart Van Assche

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cc00cc1f-17d7-105e-ef2c-61791b7cc676@kernel.dk \
    --to=axboe@kernel.dk \
    --cc=Linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=keith.busch@intel.com \
    --cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
    --cc=lsf-pc@lists.linux-foundation.org \
    --cc=sagi@grimberg.me \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox