public inbox for linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@acm.org>
To: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Cc: "Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
	Can Guo <quic_cang@quicinc.com>,
	"James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Peter Wang <peter.wang@mediatek.com>,
	Avri Altman <avri.altman@sandisk.com>,
	Manivannan Sadhasivam <mani@kernel.org>,
	"Bao D. Nguyen" <quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com>,
	Stanley Jhu <chu.stanley@gmail.com>,
	Asutosh Das <quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare() compatible with MCQ
Date: Mon, 30 Jun 2025 13:19:37 -0700	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cd2e929a-1328-4618-89dd-01f9992ca779@acm.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20250624201252.396941-1-bvanassche@acm.org>

On 6/24/25 1:12 PM, Bart Van Assche wrote:
> ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare() only supports the lecagy doorbell mode and
> may wait up to 20 ms longer than necessary. Hence this patch that reworks
> ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare(). Compile-tested only.
(replying to my own e-mail)

Can someone from Qualcomm please help with reviewing and/or testing this
patch? I'd like to get rid of the ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr()
function before anyone adds more callers to that function.
ufshcd_wait_for_doorbell_clr() supports the legacy doorbell mode but not
MCQ.

Thanks

Bart.

  reply	other threads:[~2025-06-30 20:19 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2025-06-24 20:12 [PATCH] scsi: ufs: Make ufshcd_clock_scaling_prepare() compatible with MCQ Bart Van Assche
2025-06-30 20:19 ` Bart Van Assche [this message]
2025-07-01  4:04 ` Ziqi Chen
2025-07-03  8:29 ` Ziqi Chen
2025-07-07 19:40   ` Bart Van Assche
2025-07-04 12:04 ` Peter Wang (王信友)

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cd2e929a-1328-4618-89dd-01f9992ca779@acm.org \
    --to=bvanassche@acm.org \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=avri.altman@sandisk.com \
    --cc=chu.stanley@gmail.com \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=mani@kernel.org \
    --cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
    --cc=peter.wang@mediatek.com \
    --cc=quic_asutoshd@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_cang@quicinc.com \
    --cc=quic_nguyenb@quicinc.com \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox