From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from smtp.kernel.org (aws-us-west-2-korg-mail-1.web.codeaurora.org [10.30.226.201]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by smtp.subspace.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2553142AA5 for ; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:59:40 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 ARC-Seal:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755305981; cv=none; b=HxT1qvri0Lht1spgYY2i/gk+pApBuJ48VwXU0vIy3kmWwbGoYIZ6LhKuRxaQqZYq8gwz4MWpFnGrW6G6UrajER9kX2HqOg1efzeliOw219PjqK2JrcQFAknNySEG8pBw8c6VEo3V3OO+iZwSv2FQw/8uJ68l1solpUrukcYWYkc= ARC-Message-Signature:i=1; a=rsa-sha256; d=subspace.kernel.org; s=arc-20240116; t=1755305981; c=relaxed/simple; bh=qk8t1kyH6fz1dLfyDV4SGYYLojkNv94+BzvFaML0HN0=; h=Message-ID:Date:MIME-Version:Subject:To:Cc:References:From: In-Reply-To:Content-Type; b=bsPHawzK5rJ39ZME+tHbcARBMoYXHMssIQ6aAIpzkLuK/Mreit70ufVtnkDnL3vNrcVmNI8Q6KIVrwr+nN53l/8EEFg/XAiH5nN43xzPdYJWWTFwza3e16/l2SrWUUpopOJ68jAARoTAnxCpYpjVzSz4dAm87evgefc/uIr5AaI= ARC-Authentication-Results:i=1; smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b=bn6/hlX+; arc=none smtp.client-ip=10.30.226.201 Authentication-Results: smtp.subspace.kernel.org; dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kernel.org header.i=@kernel.org header.b="bn6/hlX+" Received: by smtp.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id D6CC3C4CEEB; Sat, 16 Aug 2025 00:59:39 +0000 (UTC) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=kernel.org; s=k20201202; t=1755305980; bh=qk8t1kyH6fz1dLfyDV4SGYYLojkNv94+BzvFaML0HN0=; h=Date:Subject:To:Cc:References:From:In-Reply-To:From; b=bn6/hlX+as8y9czsjVaqqGKqsvn7Cm3b56EpDQ6vSZRYY7qe7yDz5Q2BYzzcOC9bP h7SpXLj4LlsWAYosSVHhouqGv8798LexHse7OSD7NAg3hcAtjcx6I13DHHdF9a/4Oi I4UOvmIM/Dcq7kitnqa5GeSGyj1OxJyfqpCbvY3JDbgIUIQegmkkCwuOxWWIta4V20 9qeXJyi20vZuf9pCnklQIPfXm5PdxqZydzRpXgm4/h/WMFUJLgUZ3Irh3kgzpBoU7d f1qXp/6bK7B7X0onucRIak9RMOcj2E344IOQXIUk0/KBRUkBAp5rXoN+xjINED+pRt MWQeCimKWYbjA== Message-ID: Date: Sat, 16 Aug 2025 09:59:38 +0900 Precedence: bulk X-Mailing-List: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org List-Id: List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: MIME-Version: 1.0 User-Agent: Mozilla Thunderbird Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 8/8] scsi: scsi_debug: Add option to suppress returned data but return good status To: "Ewan D. Milne" , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org Cc: michael.christie@oracle.com, dgilbert@interlog.com, bvanassche@acm.org References: <20250815211525.1524254-1-emilne@redhat.com> <20250815211525.1524254-9-emilne@redhat.com> Content-Language: en-US From: Damien Le Moal Organization: Western Digital Research In-Reply-To: <20250815211525.1524254-9-emilne@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit On 8/16/25 06:15, Ewan D. Milne wrote: > This is used to test the earlier read_capacity_10()/16() retry patch. > > Signed-off-by: Ewan D. Milne Looks OK, but it would be nice to be able to suppress the data only for the first X commands, so that the retires can be exercised with a success in them instead of all of them failing to give data. Reviewed-by: Damien Le Moal -- Damien Le Moal Western Digital Research