From: James Bottomley <jejb@linux.ibm.com>
To: "Jason A. Donenfeld" <Jason@zx2c4.com>,
"Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org
Subject: Re: calling context of scsi_end_request() always hard IRQ or sometimes different?
Date: Fri, 06 May 2022 14:19:43 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <ce95ca87344df10a477f16232815e8590118188e.camel@linux.ibm.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <YnVTf+vkcLl2wZZE@zx2c4.com>
On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 18:57 +0200, Jason A. Donenfeld wrote:
> Hey James, Martin,
>
> I'm in the process of fixing a few issues with the RNG and one thing
> that surprised me is that scsi_end_request() appears to be called
> from hard IRQ context rather than some worker or soft IRQ as I
> assumed it would be. That's fine, and I can deal with it, but what I
> haven't yet been able to figure out is whether it's _always_ called
> from hard IRQ, or whether it's sometimes from hard IRQ and sometimes
> not, and so I should handle both cases in the thing I'm working on?
>
> And if the answer turns out to be, "I don't know; that's really
> complicated and..." just say so, and I'll just try to work out the
> whole function graph.
Are you sure you mean scsi_end_request()? It's static to scsi_lib.c so
its call graph is tiny it basically goes from the blk-mq complete
function (softirq) through scsi_complete->scsi_finish_command-
>scsi_io_completion->scsi_end_request
However, I didn't think it was ever called from hard IRQ context,
that's usually scsi_done() (which can also be called from other
contexts).
James
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2022-05-06 18:20 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 4+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2022-05-06 16:57 calling context of scsi_end_request() always hard IRQ or sometimes different? Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-06 18:19 ` James Bottomley [this message]
2022-05-06 19:22 ` Jason A. Donenfeld
2022-05-06 20:11 ` James Bottomley
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=ce95ca87344df10a477f16232815e8590118188e.camel@linux.ibm.com \
--to=jejb@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=Jason@zx2c4.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox