linux-scsi.vger.kernel.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
To: "James E.J. Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com>,
	Christoph Hellwig <hch@infradead.org>,
	Hannes Reinecke <hare@suse.de>
Cc: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org,
	Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de>
Subject: [PATCH 0/3] SCSI: Fix hard lockup in scsi_remove_target()
Date: Wed, 14 Oct 2015 15:50:05 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <cover.1444829611.git.jthumshirn@suse.de> (raw)

Removing a SCSI target via scsi_remove_target() suspected to be racy. When a
sibling get's removed from the list it can occassionly happen that one CPU is
stuck endlessly looping around this code block

list_for_each_entry(starget, &shost->__targets, siblings) {
        if (starget->state == STARGET_DEL)
                continue;

Resulting in the following hard lockup.

Kernel panic - not syncing: Watchdog detected hard LOCKUP on cpu 0
[...]
Call Trace:
 [<ffffffff8100471d>] dump_trace+0x7d/0x2d0
 [<ffffffff81004a04>] show_stack_log_lvl+0x94/0x170
 [<ffffffff81005cc1>] show_stack+0x21/0x50
 [<ffffffff8151aa75>] dump_stack+0x41/0x51
 [<ffffffff8151545a>] panic+0xc8/0x1d7
 [<ffffffff810fbdda>] watchdog_overflow_callback+0xba/0xc0
 [<ffffffff811336c8>] __perf_event_overflow+0x88/0x240
 [<ffffffff8101e3aa>] intel_pmu_handle_irq+0x1fa/0x3e0
 [<ffffffff81522836>] perf_event_nmi_handler+0x26/0x40
 [<ffffffff81521fcd>] nmi_handle.isra.2+0x8d/0x180
 [<ffffffff815221e6>] do_nmi+0x126/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff8152159b>] end_repeat_nmi+0x1a/0x1e
 [<ffffffffa00212e8>] scsi_remove_target+0x68/0x240 [scsi_mod]
 [<ffffffff81072742>] process_one_work+0x172/0x420
 [<ffffffff810733ba>] worker_thread+0x11a/0x3c0
 [<ffffffff81079d34>] kthread+0xb4/0xc0
 [<ffffffff81528cd8>] ret_from_fork+0x58/0x90

This series attacks the issue by 1) decoupling the __targets and __devices
lists of struct Scsi_Host from the host_lock spinlock by introducing spinlocks
for each list and 2) de-coupling the list traversals needed for detecting
targets/devices to be removed from the actual removal by moving list entries to
be deleted to a second list and perform the deletion there.


The whole series survived a nearly 48h test loop of:
while [ $not_done  ]; do
	umount $mountpoint;
	rmmod $module;
	modprobe $module;
	mount $mountpoint;
done

This is a follow up of the patch proposed here:
http://marc.info/?l=linux-scsi&m=144377409311774&w=2
incorporating Christoph's comment

Johannes Thumshirn (3):
  SCSI: Introduce device_lock and target_lock in Scsi_Host
  SCSI: Rework list handling in scsi_target_remove
  SCSI: Rework list handling in __scsi_target_remove

 drivers/scsi/53c700.c     |  3 +++
 drivers/scsi/hosts.c      |  2 ++
 drivers/scsi/scsi.c       |  8 ++++----
 drivers/scsi/scsi_scan.c  | 10 +++++-----
 drivers/scsi/scsi_sysfs.c | 43 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------------
 include/scsi/scsi_host.h  |  2 ++
 6 files changed, 37 insertions(+), 31 deletions(-)

-- 
1.8.5.6

             reply	other threads:[~2015-10-14 13:50 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2015-10-14 13:50 Johannes Thumshirn [this message]
2015-10-14 13:50 ` [PATCH 1/3] SCSI: Introduce device_lock and target_lock in Scsi_Host Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 14:14   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-14 14:17   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-14 14:35   ` kbuild test robot
2015-10-14 13:50 ` [PATCH 2/3] SCSI: Rework list handling in scsi_target_remove Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 14:18   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-14 13:50 ` [PATCH 3/3] SCSI: Rework list handling in __scsi_target_remove Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 14:19   ` Hannes Reinecke
2015-10-14 14:30 ` [PATCH 0/3] SCSI: Fix hard lockup in scsi_remove_target() James Bottomley
2015-10-14 14:39   ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 15:45     ` James Bottomley
2015-10-14 17:36       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 18:18       ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-16 11:24         ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 16:12     ` Christoph Hellwig
2015-10-14 17:34       ` Johannes Thumshirn
2015-10-14 20:22   ` Ewan Milne
2015-10-15  7:07     ` Johannes Thumshirn

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=cover.1444829611.git.jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --to=jthumshirn@suse.de \
    --cc=James.Bottomley@HansenPartnership.com \
    --cc=hare@suse.de \
    --cc=hch@infradead.org \
    --cc=linux-kernel@vger.kernel.org \
    --cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).