Re: [PATCH V2] scsi: ufs: Add UFS3.0 in ufs HCI version check

[nitirawa@codeaurora.org]

On 2021-01-30 00:55, Bean Huo wrote:
> On Tue, 2021-01-19 at 17:37 +0530, Nitin Rawat wrote:
>> As per JESD223D UFS HCI v3.0 spec, HCI version 3.0
>> is also supported. Hence Adding UFS3.0 in UFS HCI
>> version check to avoid logging of the error message.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Nitin Rawat <nitirawa@codeaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c | 5 +++--
>>  drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshci.h | 1 +
>>  2 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> index 82ad317..54ca765 100644
>> --- a/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> +++ b/drivers/scsi/ufs/ufshcd.c
>> @@ -9255,8 +9255,9 @@ int ufshcd_init(struct ufs_hba *hba, void
>> __iomem *mmio_base, unsigned int irq)
>>         if ((hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_10) &&
>>             (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_11) &&
>>             (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_20) &&
>> -           (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21))
>> -               dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS version 0x%x\n",
>> +           (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_21) &&
>> +           (hba->ufs_version != UFSHCI_VERSION_30))
>> +               dev_err(hba->dev, "invalid UFS HCI version 0x%x\n",
>>                         hba->ufs_version);
> 
> Hi Nitin
> Except HCI 1.0 / 1.1 / 2.0 / 2.1 / 3.0, do you have the other UFS HCI
> version? if no, current driver supports all of them,  instead of
> scaling these check, and avoid logging of the error message, I suggest
> you can directly delete these redundant checkup.
> 
> If there is a weird HCI version that not supported by the current
> driver, you can only add an unsupported checkup list. thus, you don't
> need to scale this useless checkup.
> 
> Bean

Hi Bean,
That's a good suggestion. If nobody has any concern, i will
post new patchset by removing these redundant check.

Regards,
Nitin