From: Damien Le Moal <dlemoal@kernel.org>
To: John Garry <john.g.garry@oracle.com>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@lst.de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Cc: Ming Lei <ming.lei@redhat.com>,
Nilay Shroff <nilay@linux.ibm.com>,
linux-block@vger.kernel.org, linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org,
nbd@other.debian.org, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@oracle.com>,
Johannes Thumshirn <johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2025 18:57:48 +0900 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d7db7620-1f2e-4216-8929-2cfd4d847447@kernel.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <79d85a4e-57c3-454e-a65b-d2a3764eaf0c@oracle.com>
On 2025/01/10 18:56, John Garry wrote:
> On 10/01/2025 05:47, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> -static ssize_t queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>> - const char *page, size_t count)
>> +static int queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>> + const char *page, size_t count, struct queue_limits *lim)
>> {
>> - struct queue_limits lim;
>> unsigned long ios;
>> ssize_t ret;
>>
>> @@ -284,18 +269,13 @@ static ssize_t queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
>> if (ret < 0)
>> return ret;
>>
>> - lim = queue_limits_start_update(disk->queue);
>> if (ios)
>> - lim.flags |= BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> + lim->flags |= BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> else
>> - lim.flags &= ~BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> -
>> - ret = queue_limits_commit_update(disk->queue, &lim);
>> - if (ret)
>> - return ret;
>> -
>> - return count;
>> + lim->flags &= ~BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH;
>> + return 0;
>> }
>
> BTW, this function seems to duplicate queue_feature_store(), no?
>
> I mean, why not:
>
> static int queue_iostats_passthrough_store(struct gendisk *disk,
> const char *page, size_t count, struct queue_limits *lim)
> {
> return queue_feature_store(disk, page, count, lim,
> BLK_FLAG_IOSTATS_PASSTHROUGH);
> }
>
> I think that there is even a macro for this.
Another cleanup to add to the pile I guess :)
--
Damien Le Moal
Western Digital Research
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2025-01-10 9:57 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 22+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2025-01-10 5:47 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 01/11] block: fix docs for freezing of queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 8:43 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 02/11] block: add a queue_limits_commit_update_frozen helper Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 03/11] block: check BLK_FEAT_POLL under q_usage_count Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 04/11] block: don't update BLK_FEAT_POLL in __blk_mq_update_nr_hw_queues Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 9:15 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:18 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 9:51 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:56 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 9:56 ` John Garry
2025-01-10 9:57 ` Damien Le Moal [this message]
2025-01-10 10:01 ` Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 06/11] block: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order in sysfs store methods Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 07/11] nvme: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 08/11] nbd: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 09/11] usb-storage: " Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 10/11] loop: refactor queue limits updates Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 5:47 ` [PATCH 11/11] loop: fix queue freeze vs limits lock order Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-10 14:32 ` fix queue freeze and limit locking order v4 Jens Axboe
-- strict thread matches above, loose matches on Subject: below --
2025-01-09 5:57 fix queue freeze and limit locking order v3 Christoph Hellwig
2025-01-09 5:57 ` [PATCH 05/11] block: add a store_limit operations for sysfs entries Christoph Hellwig
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d7db7620-1f2e-4216-8929-2cfd4d847447@kernel.org \
--to=dlemoal@kernel.org \
--cc=axboe@kernel.dk \
--cc=hch@lst.de \
--cc=johannes.thumshirn@wdc.com \
--cc=john.g.garry@oracle.com \
--cc=linux-block@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=linux-nvme@lists.infradead.org \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
--cc=ming.lei@redhat.com \
--cc=nbd@other.debian.org \
--cc=nilay@linux.ibm.com \
--cc=usb-storage@lists.one-eyed-alien.net \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox