From: michael.christie@oracle.com
To: Laurence Oberman <loberman@redhat.com>,
martin.petersen@oracle.com, linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org,
emilne@redhat.com, jpittman@redhat.com, jmeneghi@redhat.com,
Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] V2 scsi_mod: Add a new parameter to scsi_mod to control
Date: Fri, 19 Apr 2024 14:28:15 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <d82ee3b2-ded7-4020-a286-e9aff060572e@oracle.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20240418181038.198242-1-loberman@redhat.com>
On 4/18/24 1:10 PM, Laurence Oberman wrote:
> Resend of this patch as V2 against Martin's tree.
> Changes: Removed initialization of global variable storage_quiet_discovery
>
> This new parameter storage_quiet_discovery defaults to 0 and behavior is
> unchanged. If its set to 1 on the kernel line then sd_printk and
> sdev_printk are disabled for printing. The default logging can be
> re-enabled any time after boot using /etc/sysctl.conf by setting
> dev.scsi.storage_quiet_discovery = 0.
> systctl -w dev.scsi.storage_quiet_discovery=0 will also change it
> immediately back to logging. i
> Users can leave it set to 1 on the kernel line and 0 in the conf file
> so it changes back to default after rc.sysinit.
> This solves the tough problem of systems with 1000's of
> storage LUNS consuming a system and preventing it from booting due to
> NMI's and timeouts due to udev triggers.
>
I didn't see v1 so maybe this was already asked. Why can you use the
existing SCSI_LOG infrastructure for this?
For example, are the printks that are causing you problems specific
calls that are not already covered by SCSI_LOG, like the sdev_printk in
scsi_probe_lun? Do we just want to have those covered by a new SCSI_LOG
value like SCSI_LOG_DISCOVERY?
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2024-04-19 19:28 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2024-04-18 18:10 [PATCH] V2 scsi_mod: Add a new parameter to scsi_mod to control Laurence Oberman
2024-04-19 0:54 ` Laurence Oberman
2024-04-19 18:16 ` Bart Van Assche
2024-04-19 19:28 ` michael.christie [this message]
2024-04-19 19:36 ` Laurence Oberman
2024-04-21 22:13 ` Laurence Oberman
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=d82ee3b2-ded7-4020-a286-e9aff060572e@oracle.com \
--to=michael.christie@oracle.com \
--cc=Bart.VanAssche@wdc.com \
--cc=emilne@redhat.com \
--cc=jmeneghi@redhat.com \
--cc=jpittman@redhat.com \
--cc=linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org \
--cc=loberman@redhat.com \
--cc=martin.petersen@oracle.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox