Re: [PATCH] scsi: sd: Revert "Rework asynchronous resume support"

Bart Van Assche
2022-08-22T02:52:40Z

On 8/21/22 02:16, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> It looks like there is a (different) regression in v6.1-rc1 related
> to s2idle and s2ram, which is not fixed by this patch. In fact it
> also happens on boards where SATA is not used, it is just less likely
> to happen on the non-SATA boards.
> I still have to bisect it, which may take some time, as the issue is
> not 100% reproducible.

Hi Geert,

What kind of regression are you encountering? A crash, a hang or
something else? Are any call traces available?

I posted another revert earlier today but that revert is for code paths
not related to suspend/resume functionality. See also
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-scsi/20220821220502.13685-1-bvanassche@acm.org/

Thanks,

Bart.