From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 From: "Bart Van Assche" Subject: Re: [PATCH 2.6.25.1] Add scsi_execute_async_fifo() Date: Fri, 2 May 2008 18:43:22 +0200 Message-ID: References: <200805021638.42972.bart.vanassche@gmail.com> <20080502153306.GB7376@infradead.org> <20080502155525.GA16353@infradead.org> <20080502161629.GF14976@parisc-linux.org> <1209745809.3121.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Return-path: Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com ([209.85.128.185]:33652 "EHLO fk-out-0910.google.com" rhost-flags-OK-OK-OK-OK) by vger.kernel.org with ESMTP id S1757395AbYEBQnY (ORCPT ); Fri, 2 May 2008 12:43:24 -0400 Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id 18so1194168fkq.5 for ; Fri, 02 May 2008 09:43:22 -0700 (PDT) In-Reply-To: <1209745809.3121.43.camel@localhost.localdomain> Content-Disposition: inline Sender: linux-scsi-owner@vger.kernel.org List-Id: linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org To: James Bottomley Cc: Matthew Wilcox , Christoph Hellwig , linux-scsi@vger.kernel.org, Vladislav Bolkhovitin , scst-devel@lists.sourceforge.net On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 6:30 PM, James Bottomley wrote: > Um, you claimed to be running benchmarks against it in the thread you > just quoted to push for SCST inclusion. If you genuinely don't know > which code is actually in the kernel, what exactly were the benchmarks > against? This is getting off-topic. To answer your question: for downloading, installing and benchmarking an iSCSI target implementation, you don't have to know the names of any kernel source files. Knowledge of the name of the relevant kernel module is enough. Bart.